Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Perceptions and Truism of Climate Variability within Smallholder Farming Communities in Meru County, Kenya

Mwoga Muthee, Joy Obando, Fuchaka Waswa

Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 1–12 · Published 23 Sep 2015

10.9734/JSRR/2016/20239

Abstract

Aims: To assess actual and perceived climate variability within smallholder communities in Meru county. Study Design: A cross-section survey to obtain data on farmers’ perceptions and using Long term hydro-climatic records. Place and Duration of the Study: Targeted smallholder farmers in the seven major sub-agro ecological zones of Meru County. Rainfall and stream flow records ranging between 1976 and 2011 were used. Household survey and focused groups discussions were conducted in August 2010. Methodology: A stratified random sampling was used in 7 sub agroecological zones, each zone representing a stratum. Structured questionnaire was administered to 275 household heads. Focus group discussions were undertaken to understand the community perspective on climate variability. Data was analysed employing descriptive statistics. Using rainfall data from 3 stations and 1 river gauge, seasonal rainfall and stream flow anomalies were computed. ANOVA was used to determine significant mean differences across represented sub-agroecological zone.  Results: The key indicator of climate variability was variations in rainfall. In the low highland 1, coefficient of variability in rainfall amount for first season was 0.43 and 0.26 for second season. For the upper midland 2 and in the transition zone with upper midland 3 the coefficient of variability for first season was 0.36 and 0.37 respectively. As such the first season was the main determinant of annual agricultural productivity in both upper midland and low highland agro-ecological zones. February and September had highest (0.44) Stream flow coefficient of variability. Majority (91.6%) of respondents concurred that there was climate variability, an indication of the awareness level. Conclusion: Responses were pegged on perceived forms of climate variability. There was divergence in observed and perceived climate variability parameters necessitating integration of farmers’ and scientific approaches in mitigation against effects of climate variability. Planning for effective agricultural productivity needs to be seasonal and agro-ecological zone specific to counter temporal and spatial variations.

Agroecological zone rainfall variability smallholder farmers’ responses.

References (10)

  1. 1 The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture [DOI]
  2. 2 Some methods for testing the homogeneity of rainfall records [DOI]
  3. 3 Drought : a global assessment
  4. 4 Warming of the Indian Ocean threatens eastern and southern African food security but could be mitigated by agricultural development [DOI]
  5. 5 Observed Impact of Snow Cover on the Heat Balance and the Rise of Continental Spring Temperatures [DOI]
  6. 6 FARMER PERCEPTIONS ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND VARIABILITY IN SEMI-ARID ZIMBABWE IN RELATION TO CLIMATOLOGY EVIDENCE
  7. 7 Climate Variability and Water Resources Degradation in Kenya: Improving Water Resources Development and Management
  8. 8 Seasonal and Regional Characteristics of U.S. Streamflow Trends in the United States from 1940 to 1999 [DOI]
  9. 9 Alternative extension approaches to technology dissemination for sustainable agriculture in the Punjab, Pakistan
  10. 10 Effects of Climate Variability on Water Resources and Livelihoods and State of Adaptive Capacity in semi-arid Tharaka district, Kenya.

Cited by 6

Understanding the Role of User Needs and Perceptions Related to Sub-Seasonal and Seasonal Forecasts on Farmers' Decisions in Kenya: A Systematic Review

Richard Muita, Andrew Dougill, Joseph Mutemi · Frontiers in Climate · 2021

Showing 1 of 6 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

74

Page views

0

PDF downloads

48

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.