Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Meteorological Variables for Weather Forecasting

Omodara E. Obisesan

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 234–252 · Published 9 Jan 2024

10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i13829

Abstract

This study trained six machine learning models to predict meteorological variables at a tropical location. The models used are: Multiple linear regression, Decision tree, Random forest, Support vector machine, Extreme gradient boosting and Multilayer perceptron. This was with the aim of determining the best machine learning model for weather forecasting in a tropical location. The meteorological variables that were predicted are: Temperature, Solar radiation, Relative humidity and Wind speed.  To identify the efficiency and to quantify the predictive capacity of each models, evaluation metrics such as coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean square error (RMSE) were employed. The best performed model for temperature is the Random Forest which has R2 of 0.93, MAE of 0.78 0C, MAPE of 2.84 % and RMSE of 1.13 0C. Also, the best performed model for solar radiation is the Random Forest having an R2 value of 0.72, MAE of 85.34 W/m2 and RMSE of 19008.45 W/m2. For relative humidity, Random Forest also has the best performance. From the evaluation metrics, it has R2 of 0.92, MAE of 3.41 %, MAPE of 0.75 % and RMSE of 24.71 %. The best performed technique for predicting the wind speed was also the Random Forest having an R2 value of 0.79, MAE of 0.16 m/s and RMSE of 0.044 m/s. The study concluded that the best machine learning model for predicting meteorological variables in a tropical location is the Random Forest.

Machine learning predicting models meteorological variables weather forecasting

Cited by 20

A deep learning perspective on meteorological droughts prediction in the Mun River Basin, Thailand

Usa Wannasingha Humphries, Muhammad Waqas, Phyo Thandar Hliang · AIP Advances · 2024

Showing 11 of 20 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

22

Page views

0

PDF downloads

1

Outbound clicks

20

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.