Impact of Optimizing Critical Care Resources in Pediatric Surgery Patients
Nora Mohammed Seiam, Ahmed Hassan Nofal, Ahmed Ibrahim Harkan, Khaled Talaat Muhammad
Asian Journal of Pediatric Research · pp. 33–42 · Published 6 Feb 2023
10.9734/ajpr/2023/v11i1213Abstract
Background: Prediction scores could help to timely identify patients at risk. More intense care monitoring outside the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) could improve outcomes. These concepts of critical care without borders could be implemented shortly with local resources and improve patient safety. Predict more, do less in PICUs, and more in the ward. The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of prediction scores for identification of postoperative high risk surgical patients and their need for pediatric intensive care unit admission. Methods: This prospective study was carried out on 40 pediatric patients. The studied patients were divided into three groups. LR Group: 14 cases with ASA = 1, 2 PEWS ≤ 2, pSOFA ≤ 7, LqSOFA < 2. IR Group: 10 cases with PEWS = 3, 4 pSOFA = 8 -11 HiR Group: 16 cases with ASA = 3 -5, PEWS ≥ 5, pSOFA ≥ 12, LqSOFA ≥ 2. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) scoring was obtained from each patient preop. The Pediatric Early Warning (PEWS) Scoring was obtained from each patient immediately postop. The Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) Scoring was obtained from patients admitted to PICU on day 1 and day 7. Liverpool quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (LqSOFA) scoring was obtained from all patients on admission. Results: Regarding prognostic performance of different scores to predict mortality. For ASA score: it was statistically significant with AUC = .882, cut off values > 3, sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 88.89%, PPV = 42.9% and NPV = 97%. -For PEW score: it was statistically significant with AUC = .892, cut off values > 5, sensitivity = 79%, specificity = 80.56%, PPV =30% and NPV = 96.7%. -For pSOFA score: it was statistically significant with AUC = .931, cut off values > 14, sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 86.11%, PPV =37.5%, and NPV = 96.9%. All ASA, PEW, and pSOFA were statistically significant as univariate but none was significant as multivariate. Conclusions: ASA score, pSOFA score and PEWS score were significant predictor to length of stay (>21 days). ASA score, PEW score and pSOFA score were significant as predictor to mortality. ASA score and PEWS score were highly significant as to predict PICU Admission postop. PEWS score was highly significant as to predict PICU Admission postop. ASA, PEWs, and pSOFA were predictors for LOS for more than 21 days, predictors of mortality and predictors for PICU admission Postop. Decreased platelets and increased WBCs, urea, creatinine, AST, and RBG were significant with HiR. LqSOFA is a simple variable bedside tool for identifying septic patients at high risk for poor outcomes.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Using Social Groups to Locate Areas with High Emergency Department Attendance, Subsequent Inpatient Admission and Need for Critical Care — shares topic coverage
- Achieving Economy of Scale in Critical Care, Planning Information Necessary to Support the Choice of Bed Numbers — shares topic coverage
- Caring within a Web of Paradoxes: The Critical Care Nurses’ Experiences of Beneficial and Harmful Effects of Technology on Nursing Care — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.