On A Shape Parameter of Gompertz Inverse Exponential Distribution Using Classical and Non Classical Methods of Estimation
Terna Godfrey Ieren, Adana’a Felix Chama, Olateju Alao Bamigbala, Jerry Joel, Felix M. Kromtit, Innocent Boyle Eraikhuemen
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 1–10 · Published 23 Jan 2020
10.9734/jsrr/2019/v25i630203Abstract
The Gompertz inverse exponential distribution is a three-parameter lifetime model with greater flexibility and performance for analyzing real life data. It has one scale parameter and two shape parameters responsible for the flexibility of the distribution. Despite the importance and necessity of parameter estimation in model fitting and application, it has not been established that a particular estimation method is better for any of these three parameters of the Gompertz inverse exponential distribution. This article focuses on the development of Bayesian estimators for a shape of the Gompertz inverse exponential distribution using two non-informative prior distributions (Jeffery and Uniform) and one informative prior distribution (Gamma prior) under Square error loss function (SELF), Quadratic loss function (QLF) and Precautionary loss function (PLF). These results are compared with the maximum likelihood counterpart using Monte Carlo simulations. Our results indicate that Bayesian estimators under Quadratic loss function (QLF) with any of the three prior distributions provide the smallest mean square error for all sample sizes and different values of parameters.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Bayesian Analysis of Weibull-Lindley Distribution Using Different Loss Functions — shares topic coverage
- E-Bayesian Estimation of Two-Component Mixture of Inverse Lomax Distribution Based on Type-I Censoring Scheme — shares topic coverage
- E-Bayesian and Hierarchical Bayesian Estimations Based on Dual Generalized Order Statistics from the Inverse Weibull Model — shares topic coverage
- QE-Bayesian and E-Bayesian Estimation of the Frechet Model — shares topic coverage
- Estimate of Population Variance by Introducing Gini’s Mean Difference as Auxiliary Information — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.