Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

The Influence of an Acidifier Feed Additive on Biochemical Parameters and Immune Response of Broilers

M. Hedayati, M. Manafi, M. Yari, A. Avara

Annual Research & Review in Biology · pp. 1637–1645 · Published 7 Feb 2014

10.9734/ARRB/2014/8210

Abstract

Aims: Dietary acidifiers appear to be a possible alternative to feed antibiotics in order to improve performance of broilers. It is generally known that dietary acidifiers lower gastric pH, resulting in increased activity of proteolytic enzymes, improved protein digestibility and inhibiting the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria in GI tract. The present paper assesses the different dosage of an acidifier on commercial broilers. Study Design: Two hundred and Forty day-old chicks were randomly distributed in a completely randomized experimental design with four treatments and three replications of twenty chicks each. Diets prepared without additive as Control (CON) (group1); 0.025% Acidifier Agent (AA1) (group2); 0.05% Acidifier Agent (AA2) (group3) and 0.1% Acidifier Agent (AA3) (group4). Place and Duration of Study: Department of Animal Science, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran, between May 2013 and September 2013. Methodology: At the end of the trials, six birds from each replicate were sacrificed by cutting the jugular vein and blood samples were individually collected in 10-mL heparinized tubes and stored on ice for hematological analysis. Serum was separated after 8 to 10 hours and was stored at –20ºC for subsequent analysis. The individual serum samples were analyzed for antibody titers against Newcastle disease (ND), Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) and Avian Influenza (AI) by ELISA technique and using an automatic analyzer. Treatment-wise means of titers were computed. The collected blood samples were analyzed for total proteins, serum albumin, uric acid and the activities of gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) and alanine amino transferase (ALT). Results: Results showed that there was no significant difference among the dietary treatments for all antibody titers again Newcastle Disease (ND), Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) and Avian Influenza (AI). The results of total protein, serum albumin and serum globulin showed no significant difference among the dietary treatments for these parameters. Activities of serum gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT), alanine amino transferase (ALT) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) also remained non-significant. Conclusion: It can be concluded that dietary acidifier agent did not have a clear positive effect on immune response and serum biochemical levels; however, there was a slight positive effect on 0.1 % level of inclusion in the diet.

Acidifier MOS lactic acid, ALT GGT immunity broilers

Cited by 12

Application of dietary organic acids in laying hens production: a comprehensive review

Jeseok Lee, Sehyeok Oh, J. Heo · Journal of Animal Science and Technology · 2025

Evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Fermentate and Xylanase in Reduced Energy Diet Fed to Broiler Chicken

E. Ismael, Eman M. Ismail, H. S. Khalefa · International Journal of Veterinary Science · 2022

Effect of Acidifier Product Supplementation in Laying Hens Challenged With Salmonella

Ashley D. Markazi, Amanda Luoma, R. Shanmugasundaram · 2019

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

12

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.