Machine Learning Optimisation for Realistic 2D and 3D PET-CT Phantom Study
Mhd Saeed Sharif, Maysam Abbod, Luke I Sonoda, Bal Sanghera
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 634–649 · Published 20 Nov 2013
10.9734/BJAST/2014/5084Abstract
An experimental study using artificial neural network (ANN) is carried out to achieve the optimal network architecture for proposed positron emission tomography (PET) application. 55 experimental phantom datasets acquired under clinically realistic conditions with different 2-D and 3-D acquisitions and image reconstruction parameters along with 2min, 3min and 4min scan times per bed are used in this study. The best scanner parameters are determined based on the ANN experimental evaluation of the proposed datasets. The analysis methodology of phantom PET data has shown promising results and can successfully classify and quantify malignant lesions in clinically realistic datasets.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Ureter with Associated Obstructive Uropathy and Chronic Pyelonephritis: A Case Report and Literature Review — shares topic coverage
- Detection of Tumour Based on Breast Tissue Categorization — shares topic coverage
- A Clinical Decision Support System to Identify and Stage Breast Cancer Tumor — shares topic coverage
- Neural Network and Regression Based Model for Cows’ Milk Yield Prediction in Different Climatic Gradients — shares topic coverage
- Modeling of Two-Phase Gas Deviation Factor for Gas-Condensate Reservoir using Artificial Neural Network — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.