Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Fast Eye Movements and Slow Eye Movements in Congenital Neurosensorial Deaf Subjects as Assessed by 2D video-Oculography™

Carlo Aleci, Lorenzo Canavese

Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal · pp. 157–164 · Published 1 Feb 2014

10.9734/OR/2014/8008

Abstract

Aims:  There is evidence that the deprivation of a sensory system at early developmental stage may lead to a functional change of the remaining one(s). Even if this process has been widely studied, results are still controversial. In particular, the auditory system might affect the oculomotor control, since saccades or fast eye movements (FEMs) and slow eye movements (SEMs) are modulated by the cochleo-vestibular input. It follows that hearing impairment would affect the SEM and saccadic pattern. Therefore, in this study FEMs and SEMs have been evaluated in congenital deaf subjects in order to state whether early auditory deprivation has influence on the oculomotor function. Study Design: Case-control study. Place and Duration of Study: Sample: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Turin, duration of the study: 6 months. Methodology:  20 congenital deaf subjects (12 males, 8 females: age range 7-15 years) and 21 age-matched normal hearing subjects (11 males, 10 females: age range 10-16 years) were recruited. Both groups, who had normal visual acuity, underwent SEM and FEM examination by means of 2D video-oculography. SEM left/right cycle gain and velocity and horizontal/vertical FEM latency, velocity and precision were analysed. Results were then compared in the two samples. Results:  No substantial differences in SEM and FEM efficiency were found between deaf and normal hearing subjects. Conclusion: Auditory deprivation does not seem to lead neither to a compensatory enhancement nor to a worsening of the oculomotor function, in contrast to the improvement of peripheral spatial visual attention as reported in literature. We suggest fine ocular movements program, even though strictly influenced by cochleo-vestibular modulation, does not look to be linked to the auditory processing.  

Deafness videoculography ocular movements FEM SEM multisensory Integration cross-modal plasticity

References (27)

  1. 1 Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans [DOI]
  2. 2 Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects [DOI]
  3. 3 Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults [DOI]
  4. 4 Visual Attention to the Periphery Is Enhanced in Congenitally Deaf Individuals [DOI]
  5. 5 Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing [DOI]
  6. 6 Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: A preliminary theoretical statement [DOI]
  7. 7 Changes in the Spatial Distribution of Visual Attention after Early Deafness [DOI]
  8. 8 Central Auditory Skills in Blind and Sighted Subjects [DOI]
  9. 9 Conceptualizing functional neuroplasticity [DOI]
  10. 10 Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals [DOI]
  11. 11 Do Deaf People See Better? Texture Segmentation and Visual Search Compensate in Adult but Not in Juvenile Subjects [DOI]
  12. 12 Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language [DOI]
  13. 13 Visual Field Asymmetries for Motion Processing in Deaf and Hearing Signers [DOI]
  14. 14 Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes [DOI]
  15. 15 Spatial Hearing in Children with Visual Disabilities [DOI]
  16. 16 Visual movement perception in deaf and hearing individuals [DOI]
  17. 17 Differences in visual search tasks between congenitally deaf and normally hearing adults [DOI]
  18. 18 Developmental intersensory interference: Augmented prenatal sensory experience interferes with auditory learning in duck embryos. [DOI]
  19. 19 Temporal processing in deaf signers*1 [DOI]
  20. 20 Prominent reflexive eye-movement orienting associated with deafness [DOI]
  21. 21 Residual Sensory Capacities of the Deaf: A Signal Detection Analysis of a Visual Discrimination Task [DOI]
  22. 22 Measuring Three Dimensions of Eye Movement in Dynamic Situations by Means of Videooculography [DOI]
  23. 23 Signal Detection Analysis of Visual Flicker in Deaf and Hearing Individuals [DOI]
  24. 24 Visual field bias in hearing and deaf adults during judgments of facial expression and identity [DOI]
  25. 25 Intermodal Competition and Compensation in Development [DOI]
  26. 26 Perception of visual temporal patterns by deaf and hearing adults [DOI]
  27. 27 Localization of Visual Targets Inside and Outside the Field of View: the Effect of Hearing Loss [DOI]

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

68

Page views

0

PDF downloads

31

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.