Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Evaluation of Psidium guajava (Guava) Leaf Extract Against Gram-Negative Bacteria in Planktonic and Biofilm Lifestyles

C. J. O. Cruzada, K. J. A. Co, T. M. C. Chua, V. A. Chuabio, K. M. D. G. Cruz, D. A. M. De Castro, J. S. Chua, J. E. E. Chua, A. I. T. Contreras, K. A. Cortez, B. M. P. Crisostomo, M. K. A. Crisostomo, F. R. A. Cruz, K. M. E. Cruzado, V. A. C. Cuyegkeng, P. M. B. Medina

Annual Research & Review in Biology · pp. 4370–4380 · Published 13 Aug 2014

10.9734/ARRB/2014/12457

Abstract

Aims: To test and compare relative efficiencies of Guava Leaf Ethanolic Extract (GLEEx) and antibiotic standards against two pathogenic gram-negative bacteria in planktonic and biofilm lifestyles. Study Design: In vitro antibacterial study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology in the University of the Philippines Manila, between January 2014 and April 2014. Methodology: The susceptibility of planktonic and biofilm forms of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to GLEEx and to appropriate antibiotic standards were evaluated using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion assay (KB) and the Bio Timer Assay (BTA), respectively. Results: In KB, GLEEx exhibited comparable antibacterial strengths against both bacteria (P > .05), but was significantly less than the antibiotic standards (P < .001). However in BTA, there is no significant difference between the antibacterial properties of GLEEx and the antibiotic standards (P> .05). Conclusion: The relative antibacterial potencies of GLEEx and standard antibiotics vary depending on bacterial lifestyle, thus suggesting the need to use BTA alongside KB when assessing the antibacterial properties of natural products.

Guava biofilm planktonic BioTimer assay Kirby-Bauer assay

References (20)

  1. 1 Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk Method [DOI]
  2. 2 Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents [DOI]
  3. 3 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Review of General Principles and Contemporary Practices [DOI]
  4. 4 Survival strategies of infectious biofilms [DOI]
  5. 5 CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH [DOI]
  6. 6 Biofilms and Antimicrobial Resistance [DOI]
  7. 7 Antimicrobial Activities of Leaf Extracts of Guava (Psidium guajavaL.) on Two Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria [DOI]
  8. 8 Analytical techniques to study microbial biofilm on abiotic surfaces: pros and cons of the main techniques currently in use. [DOI]
  9. 9 Systematic Exploration of Natural and Synthetic Flavonoids for the Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms [DOI]
  10. 10 Antibacterial activity of GUAVA, Psidium guajava Linnaeus, leaf extracts on diarrhea-causing enteric bacteria isolated from Seabob shrimp, Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (Heller) [DOI]
  11. 11 Inhibition of Major Virulence Pathways of Streptococcus mutans by Quercitrin and Deoxynojirimycin: A Synergistic Approach of Infection Control [DOI]
  12. 12 Antibacterial Activity of Psidium guajava Leaf and Bark against Multidrug-Resistant Vibrio cholerae: Implication for Cholera Control [DOI]
  13. 13 Antibacterial activity of extracts of twelvecommon medicinal plants from the Philippines [DOI]
  14. 14 BioTimer Assay, a new method for counting Staphylococcus spp. in biofilm without sample manipulation applied to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility of biofilm [DOI]
  15. 15 In vitro antibacterial activity of Psidium guajava Linn. leaf extract on clinical isolates of multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
  16. 16 INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF PLANT EXTRACTS ON MULTI-SPECIES DENTAL BIOFILM FORMATION IN-VITRO
  17. 17 Ceftazidime, a pseudomonas-active cephalosporin: in-vitro antimicrobial activity evaluation including recommendations for disc diffusion susceptibility tests [DOI]
  18. 18 Antibacterial activity of Psidium guajava linn (guava) leaves extracts on bacterial pathogens [DOI]
  19. 19 Biotimer assay for counting bacterial biofilm
  20. 20 International Journal of Microbiology [DOI]

Cited by 4

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

21

Page views

0

PDF downloads

3

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.