Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Evaluation of Melia Dubia for its Biomass Production, Carbon Stock, Carbon Sequestration and Economic Returns in Agroforestry System

V. Ishwarya Laxmi, A. Krishna, A. Madhavi Lata, A. Madhavi, Y. S. Parameswari

International Journal of Plant & Soil Science · pp. 46–54 · Published 29 May 2021

10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i1130480

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to estimate biomass production, carbon stock, carbon sequestration and economic performance of Melia dubia under agri-silviculture system. This experiment was laid out in a Split design and replicated thrice, treatments comprised of two main plots (Clones) M I MTP-I M II MTP-II and seven subplots(Intercrops) T 1 Finger millet , T 2 Foxtail millet, T 3 Pearl millet, T 4 Greengram, T 5 Blackgram, T 6 Cowpea, T 7 Only trees. Sole crop without trees are maintained. Results showed that MTP-I clone recorded higher volume, biomass production, carbon stock, carbon dioxide sequestration in agri-silviculture system when compared to MTP-II and sole crop. In terms of income wise MTP-I recorded higher gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio than MTP-II. Incase of intercrops, blackgram registered higher net returns and B:C ratio than other intercrops.

Agroforestry tree parameters carbon stock carbon sequestration economic returns

Cited by 1

Dynamic analysis of biodiversity, carbon storage and environmental factors of coniferous forest in Loudi City, Hunan Province

You Zhou, Jiyun She, Xiongmei Zhu · International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies · 2022

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

6

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

1

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.