Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Evaluation of Fungicides and Bio-Agents against Ascochyta Blight (Ascochyta rabiei) of Chickpea under Dryland Conditions of Kashmir, India

Sabiya Bashir, Mohammad Najeeb Mughal, Shabeena Majeed, Zahida Rashid, Sabeena Naseer, Zahoor A. Dar, S. A. Hakeem, Faisal Rasool, Shaheena Nagoo, Sabiha Ashraf, Shahida Iqbal

International Journal of Plant & Soil Science · pp. 888–895 · Published 29 Jul 2022

10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2131567

Abstract

Five non-systemic fungicides: chlorothalonil, carbendazim (12%) + mancozeb (63%), captan 50WP, dodine 65WP and copper oxychloride 50WP and four systemic fungicides viz., difenoconozole 25EC, carbendazim 50WP, hexaconozole 5EC and mycobutanil 10WP were evaluated against Aschochyta blight of chickpea caused by Ascochyta rabiei. The in-vitro evaluation of non-systemic fungicides through poisoned food technique at five different concentrations: 50,100, 250, 500 and 1000 µg ml-1 fungicides showed that carbendazim (12%) + mancozeb (63%) proved most effective and resulted in highest mycelial growth inhibition (82.27%) of the pathogen followed by dodine with mycelial growth inhibition of 67.99%. The least efficacious fungicide was copper oxychloride with only 29.81% mycelial growth inhibition. Among the systemic fungicides evaluated at concentrations of 25, 50, 100, 200 and 500 µg ml-1, carbendazim proved to be the most effective and caused highest mycelial growth inhibition of 90.23% followed by difenconozole (71.24%). Myclobutanil 10WP was least efficacious among the systemic fungicides and resulted in only 52.76% of mycelial growth inhibition. Among the three methods used for evaluation of efficacy of fungicides and bio-agents, revealed that the seed treatment with carbendazim (12%) + mancozeb (63%) proved most effective with lowest disease incidence (15.0%) and disease intensity (4.02%). Among the biological control agents used, seeds treated with Bacillus subtilis proved the most effective which resulted in disease incidence and intensity of 32.25 and 20.04%, respectively. Combination treatment comprising of seed treatment with Bacillus subtilis at concentration of 109spores ml-1 and foliar spray with mancozeb 63% WP+ carbendazim12%WP at the concentration of 2.5% was most efficacious and resulted in lowest disease incidence (7.80%) and disease intensity of (4.82%) while seed treatment with Bacillus subtilis at the concentration 109 spores ml-1alone was least efficacious and resulted in highest disease incidence of 53.80% with disease intensity of 37.25%. It was, however superior than control where disease incidence and intensity was 80.00% and 51.34 %, respectively.

Ascochyta bio-agents chickpea disease incidence fungicides seed treatment

Cited by 7

Fungal infections of legume crops: Challenges and management approaches

Hajar Sbai, Ahmed Hajib, Soukaina Msairi · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research · 2024

Bioprotectants for the suppression of Ascochyta rabiei infection and inoculum production on chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

Melanie Bullock, Bounnaliam Thammavongsa, Luke G. Barrett · Biological Control · 2025

Biogenic copper nanoparticles as a novel biocontrol strategy for Ascochyta blight in chickpeas

Carina Vasquez-Espejo, M. Florencia Sardo, María Teresa Álvarez Aliaga · Plant Nano Biology · 2025

Valorizing seaweed waste as a prospective biocontrol agent for organic chickpea protection

Hajare Errati, Lamyae Et-Tazy, Oussama Khibech · Organic Agriculture · 2026

Showing 4 of 7 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

31

Page views

0

PDF downloads

2

Outbound clicks

7

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.