Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Evaluation of Different Carrier Substances for the Development of an Effective Pelleted Biofertilizer for Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Using Co-inoculated Bacteria and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi

B. K. W. Pathirana, P. N. Yapa

Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Bioresource Technology · pp. 1–10 · Published 31 Jan 2020

10.9734/ajb2t/2020/v6i130070

Abstract

Aims: This study was aimed to compare aquatic weed, biochar and compost carrier substances for the development of effective pelleted biofertilizer for paddy (Oryza sativa L.) using co-inoculated bacteria, Azospirillum sp., Pseudomonas fluorescens and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Place and Duration of Study: Faculty of Applied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Mihintale, Sri Lanka between November 2018 and May 2019. Methodology: Pre-sterilized, 1 kg weight of ground carrier material was inoculated with 50 g of AMF propagules and 20 ml of 1.5 x 108 (CFU/ml) of each bacterial inoculant. Different types of pelleted biofertilizers were prepared as; aquatic weed and bioinoculum (P1), aquatic weed, bioinoculum and nutrient supplement mixture (P2), biochar and bioinoculum (P3), biochar, bioinoculum and nutrient supplement mixture (P4), compost and bioinoculum (P5), compost, bioinoculum and nutrient supplement mixture (P6). Rock phosphate and potassium feldspar was used as nutrient supplement mixture in developing some pelleted biofertilizers. Biofertilizer pellets were tested for the microbial survivability with the time by determining viable cell count of bacteria at two storage temperatures of 0°C and 30°C. Pot experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of prepared pelleted biofertilizers on growth and yield of rice and on some soil chemical and biological characteristics. Control (without biofertilizers) and above pelleted biofertilizers were added to the 3000 g of soil in pot with one paddy plant of variety BG 360. The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with five replicates. Rice roots were screened for AMF colonization after harvesting. Results: According to Tukey’s Pairwise Comparison test, control and different treatments in pot experiment were significantly different for shoot height, number of seeds per panicle, 100 seeds weight and soil pH (p ≤ 0.05). However, there was no significant difference observed for bacterial count in prepared biofertilizers and biofertilizer applied soil, relative growth rate, plant dry and fresh weights and electrical conductivity. Among different pelleted biofertilizers, application of pellets consisted of compost with bioinoculant (P5), exceedingly enhanced the rice growth and yield. Compost, bioinoculum and nutrient supplement mixture (P6) added pellets were shown highest bacterial survivability at 30°C for seven days. Although AMF colonization of rice plants were low this was the first report of citing the presence of AMF in rice roots in Sri Lanka. Conclusion: These pelleted biofertilizers have the potential to be used for improved productivity of rice variety Bg 360. Therefore, developing such bioinoculants as biofertilizers and their efficient use could be considered as a sustainable solution for rice cultivation in Sri Lanka and worldwide.

Oryza sativa L. Azospirillum sp. Pseudomonas fluorescens arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi pelleted biofertilizer

References (17)

  1. 1 Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [DOI]
  2. 2 A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [DOI]
  3. 3 Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers [DOI]
  4. 4 Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion [DOI]
  5. 5 Soil Fertility and Biodiversity in Organic Farming [DOI]
  6. 6 Microbial Inoculants and Their Impact on Soil Microbial Communities: A Review [DOI]
  7. 7 Current status of Azospirillum inoculation technology: Azospirillum as a challenge for agriculture [DOI]
  8. 8 Azospirillum sp. in current agriculture: From the laboratory to the field [DOI]
  9. 9 Plant Beneficial Bacteria [DOI]
  10. 10 Inoculation Effects of Pseudomonas putida, Gluconacetobacter azotocaptans, and Azospirillum lipoferum on Corn Plant Growth Under Greenhouse Conditions [DOI]
  11. 11 Recycling Agricultural Wastes and By-products in Organic Farming: Biofertilizer Production, Yield Performance and Carbon Footprint Analysis [DOI]
  12. 12 Soil Fertility and Indigenous Nutrient Supply in Irrigated Rice Domains of Asia [DOI]
  13. 13 Food Safety Issues for Mineral and Organic Fertilizers [DOI]
  14. 14 Evaluation of Biofertilizers in Irrigated Rice: Effects on Grain Yield at Different Fertilizer Rates [DOI]
  15. 15 Influence of Carrier Materials and Storage Temperature on Survivability of Rhizobial Inoculant [DOI]
  16. 16 Potential for Biochar as an Alternate Carrier to Peat Moss for the Preparation of Rhizobia Bio Inoculum [DOI]
  17. 17 Influence of Biofertilizers on Uptake of NPK in Soils and Eggplant [DOI]

Cited by 14

Advanced Development of Bio-fertilizer Formulations Using Microorganisms as Inoculant for Sustainable Agriculture and Environment – A Review

Nur Maisarah Mohamad Sarbani, Nazariyah Yahaya · Malaysian Journal of Science Health & Technology · 2022

Microbial biofertilizers: Recent trends and future outlook

Debmalya Dasgupta, Kulbhushan Kumar, Rashi Miglani · Recent Advancement in Microbial Biotechnology · 2021

Formulation Breakthroughs: The Key to Tackling Biofertilizer Shelf Life and Quality Challenges

S. Kanishka, M. Gnanachitra, K. Kumutha · Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology · 2025

Recent Advances in Biofertilizer Development

Mohsin Nawaz, Samina Shabbir, Nazer Manzoor · Agricultural Nutrient Pollution and Climate Change · 2025

Enabling biological nitrogen fixation in agriculture: An eco-industrial perspective

Giulia Forghieri, Elena Ghedini, Federica Torrigino · Food Bioscience · 2025

Commercialization and Market Perspectives of Biofertilizers Through Advanced Approaches

Deepak Kumar, Ritik Kumar, Sakshi · Metabolomics, Proteomics and Gene Editing Approaches in Biofertilizer Industry · 2024

Showing 7 of 14 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

41

Page views

0

PDF downloads

5

Outbound clicks

14

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.