Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Evaluation and Comparison between Amsel’s Criteria and Nugent’s Score Methods in Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginos is in Non-pregnant Women

Moallaei Hossien, Namazi Mohammad Javad, Fazaeli Yousefabad Hamid, Zargarian Mahdi

Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 500–506 · Published 20 Jan 2015

10.9734/JSRR/2015/15033

Abstract

Aim: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a poly-microbial syndrome. Amsel’s criteria or Nugent’s methods are usually used for its diagnosis. The present study was conducted to compare these two techniques regarding their reliability and possible preferences in practical use. Study Design: A Cross-sectional research was designed. There was no time dimension while existing differences were identified and became base for grouping all cases involved in the study. Place and Duration of Study: Sabzevar, Iran, During 2012 to 2013. Methodology: Four hundreds and sixteen (416) non-pregnant women with abnormal vaginal discharges were evaluated for the presence of BV using Amsel’s criteria and Nugent’s tests. All clinical symptoms and a standard screening questionnaire were prepared and collected for each person. For each case following examinations were practiced: pH, Whiff test, a test in which vaginal secretions are mixed with 10% KOH resulting in a fishy odor typical of bacterial vaginosis, and the presence of the clue cells on vaginal wet smear. Gram staining method was performed for Nugent’s method. Results: Nugent’s score and Amsel’s criteria tests showed that the prevalence of BV was 8.2% and 16.4% respectively. There was no perfect inter-rater agreement between both Amsel’s and Nugent’s score (kappa = 0.58) tests. Presence of the clue cells among different diagnostic values provided the highest degree of assurance. Conclusion: Amsel’s criteria method is a cheap and convenient means for BV diagnosis. However, Nugent's method is not always reliable due to the complexity of scoring and expertise requirements. Although we need more evidence, the results suggested that the combination of the pH and clue cells test relatively was the best practical and reliable choice in clinical set for BV diagnosis.

Bacterial vaginosis amsel’s criteria nugent’s method clue cells.

References (24)

  1. 1 Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation [DOI]
  2. 2 Nonspecific vaginitis [DOI]
  3. 3 Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: A meta-analysis [DOI]
  4. 4 Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of bacterial vaginosis [DOI]
  5. 5 Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis [DOI]
  6. 6 Bacterial colonization of the vagina during pregnancy in four ethnic groups [DOI]
  7. 7 Bacterial vaginosis: an update on diagnosis and treatment [DOI]
  8. 8 Characteristics of three vaginal flora patterns assessed by Gram stain among pregnant women [DOI]
  9. 9 Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in cases of abnormal vaginal discharge: comparison of clinical and microbiological criteria [DOI]
  10. 10 Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis and Impact of Genital Hygiene Practices in Non-Pregnant Women in Zanjan, Iran [DOI]
  11. 11 The Laboratory Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis [DOI]
  12. 12 Utility of pH test & Whiff test in syndromic approach of abnormal vaginal discharge.
  13. 13 Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women and predictive value of clinical diagnosis [DOI]
  14. 14 Accuracy of Nugent's score and each Amsel's criteria in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
  15. 15 A prospective study of genital infections in Hamedan, Iran.
  16. 16 Gardnerella vaginalis-associated bacterial vaginosis in Bulgarian women [DOI]
  17. 17 Management skills of Iranians: a comparison of technical, human and conceptual differences based on gender, age and longevity in management ranks [DOI]
  18. 18 Prevalence Of Bacterial Vaginosis In Women With Vaginal Symptoms In South Province, Rwanda [DOI]
  19. 19 Risk factors for bacterial vaginosis in women attending a hospital in Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran.
  20. 20 Diagnostic Amsel criteria compared standardized method of Gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis [DOI]
  21. 21 [Vaginal discharge in pregnant women: comparison between syndromic approach and examination of clinical nursing practice]. [DOI]
  22. 22 Comparison between clinical and laboratory diagnosis of vaginitis
  23. 23 ACCURACY OF AMSEL'S CRITERIA IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS (PRELIMINARY REPORT)
  24. 24 DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF AMSEL’S CLINICAL CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSIS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS [DOI]

Cited by 8

STUDY ON THE STATUS OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT INFECTIONS AMONG MINORITY ETHNIC ADOLESCENT GIRLS IN A LUOI DISTRICT, THUA THIEN HUE PROVINCE

Nguyen Dieu Trang Dao, Thi Bich Ngoc Phan, Vu Quoc Huy Nguyen · Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy · 2018

STUDY ON THE STATUS OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT INFECTIONS AMONG MINORITY ETHNIC ADOLESCENT GIRLS IN A LUOI DISTRICT, THUA THIEN HUE PROVINCE 

Trang Dao Nguyen Dieu, Ngọc Phan Thi Bich, Huy Nguyen Vu Quoc · Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy · 2018

Bacterial vaginosis: A state of microbial dysbiosis

Arijit Sankar Mondal, Ritu Sharma, Nitin Trivedi · Medicine in Microecology · 2023

Showing 4 of 8 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

70

Page views

0

PDF downloads

19

Outbound clicks

8

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.