Clinical Assessment: Short Term Retention of Giomer and Compomer Restorations in Class V Non-Carious Cervical Lesions
Abdul Qadir Khan Dall, Imdad Hussain Domki, Mahwish Memon, Batool Bibi, Munir Ahmed Banglani, Sarwat Batool
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International · pp. 61–67 · Published 21 Jun 2021
10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i32B31743Abstract
Objective: To compare the retention rate of giomer and compomer in Class V restorations in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL). Materials and methods: In this experimental study patients with non-carious cervical lesions were divided in to two groups (Group A and B). In group A (n=60), restoration was done with Giomer type of material and in group B (n=60) Compomer type of material was used for filling by the same operator. Cvar & Ryge Criteria were used to evaluate the retention of both materials as: Alpha (restoration fully retained), Bravo (restoration partially retained) and Charlie (restoration completely missing) at follow-ups 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th months. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 17. Results: Males were 72% and females were 28%. The Mean age was 30.62 ±3.89 ranges from 13–85 years. Charlie score was observed at 5th and 6th months. The comparison between Giomer and Compomer at follow-up of 1st, 2nd, 4rd, 4th, 5th and 6th showed no statistical difference. Conclusion: Giomer and compomer both have same retention rate in clinical trials.
Cited by 1
1 citation reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.
Related research
- Multicoloured Restorations for Pediatric Dental Patients — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.