Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study of Baska Mask and I-Gel for Airway Management in Elective Surgeries: Focus on Airway Sealing Pressure, Insertion Time, and Haemodynamic Response

Nandeeswaran Kola Sridharan, Santhosh Kumar Sutrave

Asian Journal of Medicine and Health · pp. 107–119 · Published 5 Nov 2024

10.9734/ajmah/2024/v22i111122

Abstract

Introduction: General anesthetic procedure requires a safe and open airway. Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard for airway management; it is being replaced by supraglottic airway devices because they are easy to introduce, better tolerated and results in a lesser haemodynamic response. As both the Baska mask and I-gel have a non-inflatable self-sealing mechanism, these two devices were compared in our study in terms of time taken for insertion, airway sealing pressure, the number of attempts, hemodynamic changes, and complications. Methods: A Prospective comparative study was conducted on 90 patients (45 in each group), aged 18-60 years, undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia at Tertiary care Hospital, Madurai. Patients were randomized into two groups using the computer generated statistical software STATA version14 (Texas, USA): Group B: Airway was secured by insertion of Baska mask. Group I: Airway was secured by insertion of I Gel. Following assessments were done to evaluate the SAD: Time taken to insert the device, airway sealing pressure, rate of successful insertion, number of attempts, Haemodynamic parameters, laryngopharyngeal morbidity. Data were analyzed using Student t-tests and chi-square tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean airway sealing pressure of the Baska mask (26.1+6.1 cmH2O) was significantly higher than that of the I-gel (23.1± 5.9 cmH2O) with a P value of 0.019 which was statistically significant. In our study the time taken to insert the device, for Baska mask it was 18.9+4.1 seconds and for the I gel it was 17.2±5.1 seconds with a P value of 0.089 which was statistically insignificant. In our study there was no statistical difference between Baska mask and I-gel groups in regards to hemodynamic changes (Heart rate and Mean arterial pressure). This may be due to the same stress response produced by the both devices. Conclusion: Baska mask is superior to I-gel in positive pressure ventilation under general anaesthesia for short surgical procedures with statistically significant higher airway sealing pressure though it has comparable time of insertion, haemodynamic changes and laryngopharyngeal morbidity.

Supraglottic airway devices I-gel Baska mask general anaesthesia

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.