Design and Simulation of PDMS and PMMA Based Touch Mode Capacitive Pressure Sensor: A Comparative Study
Maibam Sanju Meetei, Heisnam Shanjit Singh
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 1–9 · Published 5 May 2023
10.9734/jsrr/2023/v29i61748Abstract
Aims: In this research work, a design method and a comparative of a touch mode capacitive pressure sensor (TMCPS) using poly-dimethyl-siloxane (PDMS) and poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) is the done. A novel method is proposed to linear the output characteristics of the sensor because planer type capacitive sensors are non-linear. Study Design: This method uses a mechanical coupler to convert the deflection of the diaphragm into a linear displacement that helps to linear the output characteristics. The mathematical model of the sensor is designed and simulated the 3D model to validate the mathematically calculated values. Place and Duration of Study: This study is done in the Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi University, Arunachal Pradesh at COMSOL Simulation Laboratory during 2021 to 2023. Methodology: The mechanical and electrostatic components of the sensor are represented mathematically model in two separate parts. For this study, a square diaphragm was used since it exhibits greater deflection than circular or rectangular diaphragms. In order to validate the model equation, a 3D model of a sensor is created in the COMSOL Multiphysics simulator and simulated. For the pressure range of 0.1 [MPa] to 10.1 [MPa], the identical 3D model of the sensor construction with a square diaphragm thickness of 20 µm is simulated for PDMS and PMMA. The different elements influencing the sensor's sensitivity are discovered, and the effects of the materials PDMS and PMMA on the output characteristic are discussed. Results: The simulated and calculated sensitivity of the sensors based on PDMS are 0.03685 [fF/MPa] and 0.03467 [fF/MPa] respectively. And the simulated and calculated sensitivity of the sensors based on PMMA are 0.03929 [fF/MPa] and 0.03748 [fF/MPa] respectively. It is observed that the PDMS based TMCPS has more sensitivity then the PMMA based TMCPS. Conclusion: The PMMA based TMCPS has higher sensitivity than the PDMS based TMCPS. The various parameters that affect the sensitivity of the sensor are diaphragm shape, size, Poisson’s ratio and Young’s modulus, area covered by the dielectric material, dielectric constant of the polymers dielectric and surface are of the electrode plate. Future Scope: Future research for TMCPS can be conducted using composite polymer dielectric materials and new polymer dielectric materials to improve the sensitivity. One can optimize the sensor using different tools as the mathematical model is developed.
Cited by 1
Ananthi S, Himanshu Chaudhary, Kulwant Singh · Engineering Research Express · 2024
Related research
- Laboratory Performance Evaluation of Wantai HIV 1/2 Rapid Test Kit — shares topic coverage
- Role of Serum C-Reactive Protein in Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Modified Alvarado Score in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Cross-sectional Study — shares topic coverage
- Farnesol Sensitivity of Serum Induced Yeast to Hyphae Morphogenesis: A Study on Fifty Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans — shares topic coverage
- Pattern of Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infections among Sudanese Patients — shares topic coverage
- Chronic Osteomyelitis among Children Attending Orthopedic Services at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital: Prevalence, Etiological Agents and Their Drug Susceptibility Patterns — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.