Deep Learning Architectural Enhancements for Robust Facial Recognition in Occluded Scenarios
Afolabi Awodeyi, Omolegho A. Ibok, Omafovbe Imonikosaye, Abosede E. Adeoye
Journal of Engineering Research and Reports · pp. 157–167 · Published 8 Jul 2026
10.9734/jerr/2026/v28i71950Abstract
Background: Facial recognition systems often experience reduced performance when key facial regions are obscured by masks, sunglasses, scarves or hand overlays. Aims: The study aims to investigate architectural enhancements to standard Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models, namely Residual Network (ResNet), Mobile Neural Network (MobileNet) and Inception Network, to improve facial recognition accuracy under occluded conditions such as masks, sunglasses and scarves. Study Design: An experimental comparative study was conducted to evaluate baseline CNN architectures against architecturally enhanced versions incorporating attention mechanisms, feature fusion layers, dropout and batch normalisation. Place of Study: Southern Delta University, Ozoro, Delta State, Nigeria. Methodology: A combined dataset of approximately 25,000 facial images was assembled from benchmark sources, including Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) (Huang et al., 2007), the AR face dataset (Martinez & Benavente, 1998) and the CelebFaces Attributes (CelebA) dataset (Liu et al., 2015), supplemented with synthetic occlusion variants (masks, sunglasses, scarves and hand overlays) generated through data augmentation. ResNet-50, MobileNet and Inception backbones were enhanced with self-attention and spatial attention layers and multi-scale feature fusion modules, then trained using the Adam optimiser (learning rate 0.001, batch size 64, up to 120 epochs and early stopping after 10 stagnant epochs), with dropout (0.3-0.5) and batch normalisation applied for regularisation. Performance was assessed using precision, recall, F1-score, False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rate (FRR), comparing enhanced models against their baseline counterparts. Results: The enhanced ResNet attained 88.4% precision, 86.7% recall and an 87.5% F1-score, compared with 74.2%, 71.8% and 73.0%, respectively, for the baseline ResNet. MobileNet with feature fusion reached an F1-score of 85.3%, compared with 70.6% for baseline MobileNet. The enhanced Inception model achieved 89.1% precision, 87.4% recall and an 88.2% F1-score. Error analysis showed that the enhanced ResNet reduced FAR to 3.6% from 7.9%, while MobileNet with feature fusion reduced FRR to 5.1% from 10.2%. Overall, enhanced models improved precision, recall and F1-score by 8-12% across occlusion scenarios relative to baseline CNNs. Conclusion: Integrating attention mechanisms and feature fusion layers with training optimisations such as dropout and batch normalisation substantially strengthens the robustness of CNN-based facial recognition systems under occlusion. These architectural enhancements show potential for biometric authentication and controlled security applications. Deployment in sensitive domains, including law enforcement, should be preceded by comprehensive fairness evaluation, privacy safeguards, legal compliance and human oversight, although further work is needed to assess computational efficiency and real-time adaptability.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Automatic Segmentation of Organ at Risk in Head and Neck Cancer CT Images Using Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI) with Deep Learning Techniques — shares topic coverage
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review — shares topic coverage
- Leveraging Deep Learning Algorithms for Predicting Power Outages and Detecting Faults: A Review — shares topic coverage
- Bridging Prenatal Diagnostics and AI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Advanced Algorithms in Identifying Congenital Fetal Abnormalities — shares topic coverage
- Applications of Deep Learning in Predicting the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome from Lifestyle and Behavioral Factors: A Scoping Review — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
31
Page views
0
PDF downloads
4
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.