Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Culture-Independent Analysis of Bacterial Community Composition during Bioremediation of Crude Oil-Polluted Soil

Chioma Blaise Chikere

Microbiology Research Journal International · pp. 187–211 · Published 8 Dec 2012

10.9734/BMRJ/2012/1565

Abstract

Aim: To use cultivation-independent techniques based on DGGE of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene and to evaluate bacterial community composition during bioremediation of crude oil-polluted soil. Study Design: Molecular fingerprints of bacterial populations involved in the active phase of crude oil biodegradation were generated with DGGE after 16S rRNA gene amplification. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria, South Africa, between March and August 2008. Methodology: Crude oil-degrading bacteria in soil microcosms contaminated with 4% crude oil and then biostimulated with nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium inorganic fertilizer (NPK: designated PN soil), calcium ammonium nitrate (designated PU soil) and poultry droppings (designated PP soil) respectively were characterized with PCR of the gene for the small subunit (SSU) of the bacterial ribosome. Total culturable heterotrophic and hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria were enumerated using plate count and Bushnell Haas media. Total organic carbon content was measured throughout the study period to indirectly determine the effect of microbial activity on carbon content in biostimulated treatments as against controls. Gas chromatography was used to monitor hydrocarbon degradation with time while electron microscopy examined community richness during hydrocarbon degradation. Reamplified dominant DGGE bands (550bp) were cleaned up and sequenced using an ABI 3130XL genetic analyzer. Electropherograms were inspected with Chromas Lite 2.01. Sequence identification was performed using BLAST. Results: Dendogram of the DGGE bands constructed using Jaccard coefficient algorithm revealed that communities from PU and PP-amended soils each formed distinct clades whereas PN treated soil showed less association when compared with PU and PP respectively. Fifty distinct bands were excised, reamplified by PCR and sequenced. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of phylogenetically distinct known hydrocarbon degrading bacteria like Corynebacterium spp., Dietzia spp., Janibacter sp. low G+C Gram positive bacterial clones Nocardioides spp., Rhodococcus erythropolis and uncultured bacterial clones. Forty successful sequence data obtained from the excised DGGE bands were submitted to GenBank database under accession numbers GU451069 to GU451108. Chromatograms of the residual hydrocarbons in test treatments and controls showed that biodegradation occurred markedly in treated soils in this order PN>PU>PP while no significant loss was observed in the oil-contaminated control on days zero and 42 respectively. Bacterial counts increased significantly in PN, PU and PP treatments and not in controls PC and OC. Total organic carbon increased appreciably in PN, PU and PP respectively from day zero to day 28. Electron micrographs of microbial consortia in the nutrient-amended soils revealed presence of active populations induced by biostimulation as against the sparsely populated controls. Conclusion: The results suggest that nutrient amendment stimulates and selects indigenous soil bacteria that are able to degrade petroleum hydrocarbons.

Sequences DGGE crude oil biodegradation bioremediation electron micrographs

References (43)

  1. 1 Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA [DOI]
  2. 2 Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment [DOI]
  3. 3 Recent Advances in Petroleum Microbiology [DOI]
  4. 4 Microbial Ecology: Fundamentals and Applications
  5. 5 Microbial Population Changes during Bioremediation of an Experimental Oil Spill [DOI]
  6. 6 Identification and biodegradation potential of tropical aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms [DOI]
  7. 7 Accessing the Soil Metagenome for Studies of Microbial Diversity [DOI]
  8. 8 Microbial Population Dynamics Associated with Crude-Oil Biodegradation in Diverse Soils [DOI]
  9. 9 Microbial Activity and Community Composition during Bioremediation of Diesel-Oil-Contaminated Soil: Effects of Hydrocarbon Concentration, Fertilizers, and Incubation Time [DOI]
  10. 10 Microbial phylogeny and diversity: Small subunit ribosomal RNA sequence analysis and beyond [DOI]
  11. 11 Microbial Diversity of a Heavily Polluted Microbial Mat and Its Community Changes following Degradation of Petroleum Compounds [DOI]
  12. 12 Microbe-aliphatic hydrocarbon interactions in soil: implications for biodegradation and bioremediation [DOI]
  13. 13 Monitoring of microbial hydrocarbon remediation in the soil [DOI]
  14. 14 Achievements and new knowledge unraveled by metagenomic approaches [DOI]
  15. 15 Linking bacterial identities and ecosystem processes: can ‘omic’ analyses be more than the sum of their parts? [DOI]
  16. 16 Molecular and physiological approaches to understanding the ecology of pollutant degradation [DOI]
  17. 17 Diversity of bacterial strains degrading hexadecane in relation to the mode of substrate uptake [DOI]
  18. 18 Petroleum bioremediation — a multiphase problem [DOI]
  19. 19 Bioremediation of petroleum contamination [DOI]
  20. 20 Bioremediation. Applied microbial solutions for real-world environmental cleanup.
  21. 21 Isolation of Gram-positive n-alkane degraders from a hydrocarbon-contaminated Mediterranean shoreline [DOI]
  22. 22 Impact of oil contamination and biostimulation on the diversity of indigenous bacterial communities in soil microcosms [DOI]
  23. 23 Bacterial diversity in the active stage of a bioremediation system for mineral oil hydrocarbon-contaminated soils [DOI]
  24. 24 Recent progress and new challenges in metagenomics for biotechnology [DOI]
  25. 25 Bioreactor-based bioremediation of hydrocarbon-polluted Niger Delta marine sediment, Nigeria [DOI]
  26. 26 The Prestige oil spill: bacterial community dynamics during a field biostimulation assay [DOI]
  27. 27 Response of bacterial community during bioremediation of an oil-polluted soil* [DOI]
  28. 28 Influence of nutrients addition and bioaugmentation on the hydrocarbon biodegradation of a chronically contaminated Antarctic soil [DOI]
  29. 29 A field trial for an ex-situ bioremediation of a drilling mud-polluted site [DOI]
  30. 30 Alkane-degrading properties of Dietzia sp. H0B, a key player in the Prestige oil spill biodegradation (NW Spain) [DOI]
  31. 31 Multiple DNA Extractions Coupled with Stable-Isotope Probing of Anthracene-Degrading Bacteria in Contaminated Soil [DOI]
  32. 32 Oil bioremediation using insoluble nitrogen source [DOI]
  33. 33 Soil microbial communities: Influence of geographic location and hydrocarbon pollutants [DOI]
  34. 34 Diversity of hydrocarbon-degradingKlebsiellastrains isolated from hydrocarbon-contaminated estuaries [DOI]
  35. 35 Degradation of the“Erika”oil [DOI]
  36. 36 Nitrogen fixing bacteria enhanced bioremediation of a crude oil polluted soil [DOI]
  37. 37 The use of poultry litter as co-substrate and source of inorganic nutrients and microorganisms for the ex situ biodegradation of petroleum compounds [DOI]
  38. 38 Construction of Small-Insert and Large-Insert Metagenomic Libraries [DOI]
  39. 39 Rate-Limiting Steps in the Microbial Degradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons [DOI]
  40. 40 Dynamics of indigenous bacterial communities associated with crude oil degradation in soil microcosms during nutrient-enhanced bioremediation [DOI]
  41. 41 Phylogenetic diversity of dominant bacterial communities during bioremediation of crude oil-polluted soil [DOI]
  42. 42 Accessing uncultivated microorganisms: from the environment to organisms and genomes and back [DOI]
  43. 43 Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis characterisation of microbial communities in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and polychlorinated biphenyl contaminated soil

Cited by 52

Comparison of two DNA Extraction Protocols Representing Bacterial Community from Bulk Soil by PCR-DGGE

N. R. Martins, S. R. Passos, G. R. Xavier, F. V. Silva · Microbiology Research Journal International · 2014

Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: A Review

Godleads Omokhagbor Adams, Prekeyi Tawari Fufeyin, Samson Eruke Okoro · 2020

Characterization Of Hydrocarbon Utilizing Bacteria In Waste Engine Oil-Impacted Sites

I. I. James, M. Ben, Agnes Monday Jones · bioRxiv · 2020

Screening for Hydrocarbon Degrading Bacteria Using Redox Indicator 2, 6-Dichlorophenol Indophenol

James Iniobong Ime, Ibuot Aniefon Alphonsus, Akpan Patience Saturday · 2018

Biotechnologies for Marine Oil Spill Cleanup: Indissoluble Ties with Microorganisms.

F. Mapelli, A. Scoma, G. Michoud · Trends in Biotechnology · 2017

Showing 30 of 52 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

143

Page views

0

PDF downloads

54

Outbound clicks

52

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.