Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Plant Hybridization as an Alternative Technique in Plant Breeding Improvement

Immaculate Mueni Mwangangi, Joshua Kiilu Muli, Johnstone Omukhulu Neondo

Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science · pp. 1–11 · Published 22 May 2019

10.9734/ajrcs/2019/v4i130059

Abstract

For ages, plant breeders have relied on the genetic variability that results from sexually crossing plants within the same species. However, the variability that exists within species populations is inadequate, hence the need to exploit desirable traits of interest in distantly related or even unrelated plants through hybridization techniques. Hybridization can be categorized into two; sexual and somatic. Sexual hybridization, also referred to as wide or distant hybridization involves combining two genomes from different parental taxa through pollination, either naturally or by induction. Somatic hybridization involves the fusion of somatic cells instead of gametes, which highly depends on the ability to obtain viable protoplasts and eventually differentiate them to whole plants in vitro. The impacts of hybrids can either be positive or negative. Among the positive attributes of hybrids that have been exploited is heterosis, which results either from dominance, over-dominance or epistasis. Negative ones include sterility, arrested growth of the pollen tube and embryo abortion. To overcome these problems, chromosome doubling, the use of hormones such as 2, 4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D) and embryo rescue have been employed to overcome sterility, arrested growth of pollen tubes and embryo abortion respectively. After the development of hybrids, different hybrid identification techniques have been used to test them such as the use of molecular and morphological markers, cytogenetic analysis and fluorescent in situ hybridization. The use of hybridization techniques in plant improvement remains a vital tool to cross species barriers and utilization of important attributes in unrelated crop plants which could not have been achieved through conventional techniques of plant breeding.

Hybridization reproductive barriers molecular markers

Cited by 14

Regulatory framework for genetically modified organisms in the Kingdom of Eswatini

Bongani Z. Nkhabindze, Cebisile N. Magagula, Diana Earnshaw · GM Crops & Food · 2024

Desarrollo de híbridos de maíz de cruza simple con diferentes estrategias de selección de progenitores

Rosendo Hernández Martínez, Amalio Santacruz Varela, Cesar Augusto Reyes Méndez · Revista Bio Ciencias · 2024

Diversity Analysis of 53 Soybean Accessions Introduced from China Based on Morphological Characteristics and SSR Markers

Rosliana Purwaning Dyah, Kunto Wibisono, Rerenstradika Tizar Terryana · CURRENT APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY · 2024

ROLE OF SOMATIC CELL HYBRIDIZATION FOR CONTRIBUTION TO CROP IMPROVEMENT

FN AJMAL, M KHALIL, Q HAYYAT · Journal of Physical, Biomedical and Biological Sciences · 2026

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

14

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.