Costs of Additional Treatment Success (COATS) Based on Numbers Needed to Treat (NNT) is a Simplified Calculation Method to Facilitate Physicians Medical Decisions with Regards to Monetary Costs
Manfred Weiss, Frank Grom, Franz Porzsolt
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 636–646 · Published 31 Oct 2012
10.9734/BJMMR/2012/1379Abstract
Aims: Due to limited resources, to provide a simple and transparent tool for physicians to facilitate budget-related, medical decisions in any patient. Study Design: Comparative study. Methodology: Several articles with topics referring to the 2008 ”Surviving Sepsis Campaign” guidelines in critically ill patients with varying effects on defined clinical endpoints were analyzed regarding the costs of additional treatment success (COATS). A simplified ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio to assess COATS was expressed as the product of the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) and the difference in treatment costs per patient. Results: In publications with significant treatment effects enabling calculation of NNTs, calculating “COATS = NNT x delta costs per patient", mean costs to avoid one additional death or morbidity could be defined. Considering the 95% confidence interval, estimated costs at minimum and maximum to reach distinct clinical endpoints could be expressed. In studies with no significant results, NNTs and COATS were tending to infinity. Conclusion: COATS based on NNT as a simplified ICER is an easy way for the physician at the bedside caring for individual patients to explicitly describe the amount of money which has to be spent to reach definable aims in the clinical setting in one additional patient, such as reduction of mortality or morbidity, or to reassess therapies without significant results. In contrast to COATS, ICER based on quality-adjusted life years may be necessary to perform calculation of the short-term and long-term costs for the community and the adequate allocation of health care resources.
References (20)
- 1 Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes [DOI]
- 2 Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients [DOI]
- 3 Surviving Sepsis Campaign [DOI]
- 4 Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008 [DOI]
- 5 Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Human Activated Protein C for Severe Sepsis [DOI]
- 6 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock [DOI]
- 7 Effect of Treatment With Low Doses of Hydrocortisone and Fludrocortisone on Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock [DOI]
- 8 Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis [DOI]
- 9 Hydrocortisone Therapy for Patients with Septic Shock [DOI]
- 10 Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data [DOI]
- 11 Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adults [DOI]
- 12 Analysis of healthcare resource utilization with intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients* [DOI]
- 13 Fluid Therapy in the Critically Ill Patient [DOI]
- 14 Drotrecogin alfa (activated): does current evidence support treatment for any patients with severe sepsis? [DOI]
- 15 Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) for the treatment of severe sepsis in the United Kingdom [DOI]
- 16 Blutzuckerkontrolle bei Patienten mit Sepsis und septischem Schock [DOI]
- 17 Kosten der Sepsis [DOI]
- 18 Appraisal of health care: from patient value to societal benefit [DOI]
- 19 Measures of association: an overview with examples from Canadian emergency medicine research [DOI]
- 20 Caring and Cost: The Challenge for Physician Advocacy [DOI]
Cited by 3
Florian Lautenschlager, Franz Porzsolt, Manfred Weiss · Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · 2014
Juha E. Ahonen, Elisa Rissanen, Raija Sipilä · BMC Health Services Research · 2024
Showing 2 of 3 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Epidemiological Analysis of Infective Endocarditis at the Gold Coast Area Health Service, Australia — shares topic coverage
- Analysis of Patients Who Died Following Hartmann’s Procedure — shares topic coverage
- Is Caesarean Delivery Safe? Experience from a Low Resource Setting — shares topic coverage
- Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalised Medical Patients: Aetiology and Prognosis — shares topic coverage
- Gender-Related Differences and Mortality Predictors among Egyptian Hemodialysis Patients: A Multi-Center Prospective Observational Study — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
71
Page views
0
PDF downloads
28
Outbound clicks
3
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.