Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Conservation Culturomics: Potential Applications in South Asia

Manya Muthanna Kotera, Andrea D. Phillott

Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology · pp. 54–61 · Published 23 Sep 2022

10.9734/ajee/2022/v19i230344

Abstract

Unsustainable human behavior has significantly contributed to the contemporary global biodiversity crisis. In order to mitigate this, it is crucial to study the underlying factors that have resulted in such behavior. Conservation culturomics is an emerging research method that uses digitally available data to gain insights on human-nature relationships at relevant spatial and temporal scales. This method also provides a cost-effective mechanism to inform people-centric conservation policy. Depending on the research question, the data collection and analysis can be tailored, taking advantage of recent advances in information technology. While it is most often applied to global studies, conservation culturomics can also be applied at a regional scale to gather vast volumes of data that represent context-specific human values towards nature. Examination of case studies from South Asia demonstrate the range of potential subjects that culturomics studies can examine, including marine megafauna (whales), avifauna (vultures), and habitats (wetlands). Conservation outcomes of culturomics research are broad, and can include: ecosystem services valuation to motivate habitat restoration, spatial and temporal variation in whale sightings to inform ecotourism guidelines and management, and public perceptions of vultures to inform awareness and outreach initiatives. The major impediments to conservation culturomics in regions such as South Asia are socio-economic biases among internet users and the need for sophisticated technological knowledge; however, with the increasing accessibility of the internet, this is set to change in the future.

Culturomics conservation science human-nature relationship South Asia

References (26)

  1. 1 Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers [DOI]
  2. 2 Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions [DOI]
  3. 3 “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook [DOI]
  4. 4 Social media data for conservation science: A methodological overview [DOI]
  5. 5 Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation [DOI]
  6. 6 Conservation culturomics [DOI]
  7. 7 iEcology: Harnessing Large Online Resources to Generate Ecological Insights [DOI]
  8. 8 How to address data privacy concerns when using social media data in conservation science [DOI]
  9. 9 Digital data sources and methods for conservation culturomics [DOI]
  10. 10 A crowdsourced valuation of recreational ecosystem services using social media data: An application to a tropical wetland in India [DOI]
  11. 11 Understanding sentiment of national park visitors from social media data [DOI]
  12. 12 Recreation and environmental quality of tropical wetlands: A social media based spatial analysis [DOI]
  13. 13 Familiarity breeds content: assessing bird species popularity with culturomics [DOI]
  14. 14 Analyzing Google search data to debunk myths about the public's interest in conservation [DOI]
  15. 15 In the AI of the beholder: A comparative analysis of computer vision-assisted characterizations of human-nature interactions in urban green spaces [DOI]
  16. 16 Automated retrieval of information on threatened species from online sources using machine learning [DOI]
  17. 17 Societal attention toward extinction threats: a comparison between climate change and biological invasions [DOI]
  18. 18 Nomenclature instability in species culturomic assessments: Why synonyms matter [DOI]
  19. 19 Combining culturomic sources to uncover trends in popularity and seasonal interest in plants [DOI]
  20. 20 The power and the promise of culturomics [DOI]
  21. 21 Ethics and governance for internet‐based conservation science research [DOI]
  22. 22 The digital divide in rural South Asia: Survey evidence from Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka [DOI]
  23. 23 Quantitative conservation geography [DOI]
  24. 24 Introduction [DOI]
  25. 25 The time and timing components of conservation culturomics cycles and scenarios of public interest in the Google era [DOI]
  26. 26 Whale watching in Sri Lanka: Understanding the metadata of crowd-sourced photographs on FlickrTM social media platform [DOI]

Cited by 2

Environmental safety in the digital age: new methods and approaches

Evgeny V. Shchekotin · SOCIETY AND SECURITY INSIGHTS · 2025

Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

14

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.