Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Comparing and Modifying Eight Empirical Models of Snowmelt Using Data from Harp Experimental Station in Central Ontario

Huaxia Yao, Christopher McConnell, April James, Congsheng Fu

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 259–277 · Published 6 Oct 2012

10.9734/BJECC/2012/2249

Abstract

Aims: To modify two empirical models of snowpack and snowmelt, and compare eight such models. Study Design: Test and modify the models by using five years of snow measurements from Harp Lake. Place and Duration of Study: Dorset Environmental Science Centre, Ontario Ministry of Environment, and Department of Geography, Nipissing University, between January 2009 and August 2012. Methodology: The old daily-run WINTER model was the first model. It was modified to create a second model. The enhanced-temperature-index (ETI) model was slightly modified to be the third model. Modified WINTER and ETI were combined into the fourth model. Hydrology model BROOK90 and SWAT were used as the fifth and sixth model, also daily-run. Operating the WINTER and ETI in hourly steps created the seventh and eighth model. The calculated snow water equivalent (SWE) by each model was evaluated against the observed data to give a coefficient of efficiency (CE). Accuracy and performance of the models were compared based on CE values. Results: Modified WINTER model improved original WINTER by 20.7% (CE increased 20.7%). The performance of ETI model was 27.6% higher than the original WINTER. The new combination model produced additional improvement by 40.7 % over the original WINTER, or by 16.5% over the modified WINTER or 10.3% over the ETI. Running the model with hourly time steps rather than daily steps increased model’s accuracy: hourly WINTER raised CE by 15.4% and hourly ETI raised CE by 7.9%. Two watershed hydrology models BROOK90 and SWAT performed even better than the above six simpler snow models. Conclusion: It is suggested that the daily combination model be considered if only daily data is available, or hourly WINTER and ETI models be used if hourly runs are desired while new calibration are required when applying them to any new locations. If data requirements by BROOK90 or SWAT are met, these hydrology models would be tried.

Snowpack melt empirical model temperature radiation precipitation compare

References (21)

  1. 1 River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles [DOI]
  2. 2 SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling [DOI]
  3. 3 Changes in the Timing of Snowmelt and Streamflow in Colorado: A Response to Recent Warming [DOI]
  4. 4 Sensitivity of Annual Evaporation to Soil and Root Properties in Two Models of Contrasting Complexity [DOI]
  5. 5 Streamflow responses to past and projected future changes in climate at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, United States [DOI]
  6. 6 A study of the energy balance and melt regime on Juncal Norte Glacier, semi‐arid Andes of central Chile, using melt models of different complexity [DOI]
  7. 7 The role of winter sublimation in the Arctic moisture budget [DOI]
  8. 8 Assessing the transferability and robustness of an enhanced temperature-index glacier-melt model [DOI]
  9. 9 Topographic controls on spatial patterns of conifer transpiration and net primary productivity under climate warming in mountain ecosystems [DOI]
  10. 10 Long-Term Study of Lake Evaporation and Evaluation of Seven Estimation Methods: Results from Dickie Lake, South-Central Ontario, Canada [DOI]
  11. 11 Modelling the snow distribution at two high arctic sites at Svalbard, Norway, and at an alpine site in central Norway [DOI]
  12. 12 Water Resources Branch
  13. 13 Inter-Comparison of two Snow Models with Different Complexity using Data from an Alpine Site [DOI]
  14. 14 Multiple-scale modelling of forest snow sublimation: initial findings [DOI]
  15. 15 Modeling arctic snow distribution and melt at the 1 km grid scale* [DOI]
  16. 16 Spatial–temporal variability in solar radiation during spring snowmelt [DOI]
  17. 17 Prediction of snowmelt rates in a deciduous forest [DOI]
  18. 18 Assessment of precipitation and snowcover in northern research basins* [DOI]
  19. 19 Biogeochemistry project update : snow cores 1989-1992 : Plastic Lake & Harp Lake : report [DOI]
  20. 20 From the tree to the forest: the influence of a sparse canopy on stand scale snow water equivalent [DOI]
  21. 21 A computer-aided snowmelt model for augmenting winter streamflow simulation in a southern Ontario drainage basin [DOI]

Cited by 11

Comparison of five snow water equivalent estimation methods across categories

Huaxia Yao, Timothy Field, Christopher McConnell · Hydrological Processes · 2018

Evaluation of Runoff Simulation Using the Global BROOK90-R Model for Three Sub-Basins in Türkiye

Muhammet Cafer Ulker, Meral Buyukyildiz · Sustainability · 2023

Impact of Forest Canopy Closure on Snow Processes in the Changbai Mountains, Northeast China

Yuan Gao, Lidu Shen, Rongrong Cai · Frontiers in Environmental Science · 2022

Snowmelt modelling aspects in urban areas

Roxana-Gabriela Dobre, Dragos Stefan Gaitanaru, Constantin Radu Gogu · Procedia Engineering · 2017

Showing 5 of 11 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

77

Page views

0

PDF downloads

46

Outbound clicks

11

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.