Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparative Growth, Economic Profitability and Effluent Quality of Shrimp–mullet Polyculture Versus Grey and Tade Mullet Monocultures in Brackishwater Ponds

Asish Mondal, Joy Kumar Mandal, Deepta Chakravartty, Subhra Bikash Bhattacharyya

Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research · pp. 225–235 · Published 29 Oct 2026

10.9734/ajfar/2026/v28i101179

Abstract

The comparative economic benefits and effluent quality from shrimp–mullet polyculture (SM), grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) monoculture (GM) and tade mullet (Liza tade) monoculture (TM) were evaluated at similar production levels of 2.5 ± 0.2 tonnes ha⁻¹ over a seven-month culture period. The experiment was conducted at Raidighi, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India, in nine rectangular earthen ponds (0.15–0.2 ha). The ponds were prepared following standard procedures, and 20-30 percent of the water was exchanged during each lunar cycle throughout the culture period. Tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon), grey mullet and tade mullet were stocked at 3, 0.4 and 0.8 individuals m⁻², respectively in the SM system. Grey mullet and tade mullet were stocked at 0.8 and 1.6 numbers m⁻² in GM and TM, respectively. Shrimp PL-20 (0.02 ± 0.003 g) were stocked in SM. Initial weights of grey mullet and tade mullet fingerlings were 6.23 ± 1.71 g and 4.22 ± 0.95 g, respectively. Shrimp and fish were fed formulated floating pellet feed (26 percent crude protein) at 8–2 percent of the estimated biomass. At harvest, tiger shrimp attained 41.66 ± 2.91 g. Grey mullet grew to 304.43 ± 11.09 g in SM and 336.58 ± 14.77 g in GM. Tade mullet grew to 158.25 ± 6.99 g in SM and 187.38 ± 11.49 g in TM. Total production was 2607, 2473 and 2543 kg ha⁻¹, with benefit–cost ratios of 2.21, 1.42 and 1.81 in SM, GM and TM, respectively. Effluent nutrients and plankton density were lower in SM, indicating more efficient nutrient utilisation and better economic returns.

Shrimp–mullet polyculture grey mullet tade mullet Penaeus monodon Mugil cephalus Liza tade brackishwater aquaculture effluent quality growth performance economic profitability

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

4

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.