Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparative Evaluation of Apical Debris Extrusion during Root Canal Preparation using Three Different Rotary File Systems: A Study Protocol

Rutuja Rajnekar, Nikhil Mankar

Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International · pp. 3863–3868 · Published 28 Dec 2021

10.9734/jpri/2021/v33i60B35088

Abstract

Background: Apical extrusion of debris leads to postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure. Objectives: To comparatively evaluate debris extrusion by using Trunatomy rotary files, 2 shape, ProTaper next rotary files. Methodology: Sixty Extracted single rooted human premolar teeth will be included in the study. After access opening, canal patency will be established by 15 K-file till the apical foramen followed by determination of working length by visual method. Now the samples will be divided into 3 groups: Group1: Trunatomy, Group 2: 2 shape file, Group 3: ProTaper Next files. Following this the manufacturer's instructions will be followed for the instrumentation. During instrumentation, extruded debris and irrigants will be collected into the preweighed test tubes. Following this, these tubes will be stored in an incubator at the temperature of 70°C for next 5 days. To evaluate the resultant weight of extruded debris, these test tubes will be weighed. Expected Results: Trunatomy rotary file system is expected to produce less debris than 2 shape, ProTaper Next file system. Conclusion: This study would be helpful for clinicians to choose better and efficient file system for instrumentation which produce comparatively less debris extrusion further reducing the chances of endodontic flareup.

Apical extrusion debris Trunatomy 2 shape ProTaper Next

Cited by 1

The Management of a C1-Shaped Canal Configuration in a Mandibular Second Molar

Namrata P Jidewar, Manoj Chandak, Swayangprabha Sarangi · Cureus · 2024

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

1

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

1

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.