Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparative Assessment of Aquifer Vulnerability Near Major Dumpsites around Karu-Abuja and Keffi in Nasarawa State, Nigeria, Using Integrated Geophysical Methods

Anthony Okeh, Abu Mallam, Abel Uyimwen Osagie, Okwute, Ojonoma Loretta

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 366–414 · Published 17 Dec 2024

10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i124632

Abstract

This study investigates aquifer vulnerability to leachate infiltration near major dumpsites in Karu-Abuja and Keffi, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, using integrated geophysical methods – Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES), 2-D Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT), Self-Potential (SP), and Very Low Frequency Electromagnetic (VLF-EM). The study area spans basement complex and sedimentary formations. Data were collected from nine VES points, four ERT profiles, ten SP profiles and sixteen VLF transverses using Ohmega Allied resistivity meter and a Gem VLF receiver. The measurements identified groundwater saturation zones and contamination pathways such as fractures and faults. Data interpretation employed tools such as WINRESIST, RES2DINV, GRAPHER, SURFER and KHFFILT. Results delineated five to six geoelectric layers, including, topsoil, clayey sand, weathered/fractured, and fresh bedrocks. Keffi's topsoil resistivity values (47.1-224.2 Ω.m, in depths ≥ 2.1 m) indicate thicker overburden and better aquifer protective layers compared to Karu-Abuja's resistivity values (16.5-294.0 Ω.m, in depths ≥ 0.5 m). Leachate infiltration is observed in both areas, with materials of low resistivity values ranging from (7.2 to 9.9 Ω.m, in depths ≥ 7.7 m) and (2.8 to 9.6 Ω.m, in depths ≥ 6.37 m) in Karu-Abuja and Keffi study areas respectively, interpreted as contaminated zones. Negative SP anomalies ranging from (– 339.9 to -1.1 mV) and (-135 to -1.65 mV) attributed to electro-kinetic reactions, and high positive VLF current-density ranging from (5 to 10 %, in depths ≥ 14 m), further corroborated contamination pathways. The study evaluated the Aquifer Protective Capacities (APC) of Keffi and Karu-Abuja, revealing that Keffi showed better protection compared to Karu-Abuja, with Keffi showing poor rating of 66%; along VES 1 (0.043 S), VES 4 (0.05 S), VES 5 (0.01 S) and VES 6 (0.02 S) and a moderate rating of 33.33 %, along VES 3 (0.29 S) and VES 4 (0.33 S). Only VES 2 (0.89), representing 16.6%, had a good rating. The Karu-Abuja study area showed poor APC rating of 66.6%, along VES 1 (0.0063 S) and VES 3 (0.002 S), and a weak rating of 33.3% along VES 2 (0.1 S). The findings emphasise the need for regular Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and the installation of geo-synthetic clay liners at dumpsite bases to safeguard groundwater resources.

Leachate aquifer vulnerability aquifer protective capacity resistivity self-potential

References (12)

  1. 1 Hydrogeophysical study of Ogbese South Western Nigeria [DOI]
  2. 2 The Self-Potential Method: Theory and Applications in Environmental Geosciences [DOI]
  3. 3 Geophysical exploration to assess leachate percolation and aquifer protectivity within hydrogeological units at a major open dump in Eket, Nigeria [DOI]
  4. 4 Lead isotopic study of aplites from the Precambrian basement rocks near Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria [DOI]
  5. 5 Materials and Methods for Industrial Wastewater and Groundwater Treatment [DOI]
  6. 6 Determination of aquifer hydraulic parameters and groundwater protective capacity in parts of Nsukwa clan, Nigeria [DOI]
  7. 7 The Environmental Pressure by Open Dumpsites and Way Forward [DOI]
  8. 8 Assessment of groundwater potential using 1D model of vertical electrical sounding and aquifer protective capacity in the Naraiyur micro-watershed [DOI]
  9. 9 Evaluation of Aquifer Characteristics and Groundwater Protective Capacity in Abavo, Nigeria [DOI]
  10. 10 Field Features And Mode Of Emplacement Of Pegmatites Of Keffi Area, North Central Nigeria
  11. 11 Nonlinear Thermodynamics [DOI]
  12. 12 Geoelectric analysis for groundwater potential assessment and aquifer protection in a part of Shango, Northcentral Nigeria [DOI]

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

30

Page views

0

PDF downloads

5

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.