Chitozan-zeolite Composite Fertilizer Formulations for Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency
International Journal of Plant & Soil Science · pp. 270–277 · Published 18 Nov 2024
10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i115142Abstract
The experiment was carried out in the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry at the College of Agriculture, Vellayani, Kerala, from January to May 2024. Slow release fertilizer formulations (SRF) containing all the major (N, P,K), secondary (Ca, Mg, S) and micronutrients (Zn, B) were prepared using compatible fertilizer materials(urea, diammonium phosphate, muriate of potash, phosphogypsum, magnesium sulphate, zinc sulphate and borax), carrier materials (zeolite and chitosan) which are mixed in five ratios (1:1,1:2,1:3,2:1,3:1) and prepared by two methods namely solid impregnation and solute impregnation. Ten formulations were prepared with different combinations of fertilizer mix, carrier materials and impregnation methods. These formulations were prepared to meet the specific nutrient needs of solanaceous crops (75:40:25 N:P:K kgha-1) and the soil nutrient status. The formulations were characterized for their physical (hygroscopicity, moisture content and stability) and electro-chemical properties (pH, EC) and observed that they are non hygroscopic, non caking and are highly stable. The moisture content of formulations ranged from 2.57 % to 3.92 %, pH 6.30 to 6.81 and EC 10.06 to 16.29 dS m-1. The nutrient content in these formulations were 10.21 to 12.02 % nitrogen, 3.82 to 4.63 % phosphorus, 2.65 to 5.28 % potassium, 5.58 to 6.58 % calcium, 2.46 to 3.08% magnesium, 2.58 to 3.46% sulphur, 1.06 to 1.23% zinc and 0.15 to 0.24% boron. The highest nutrient content was obtained in formulation containing fertilizer mix + C-Z (1:1) prepared by solid impregnation method.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Susceptibility of Some Clinically Resistant Bacterial Isolates to Thyme Essential Oil, Chitosan and Lactobacillus reuteri — shares topic coverage
- Effects of Addition of TiO2 Edible Coatings and Storage Periods on the Chicken Eggs Quality — shares topic coverage
- Gelatin, Chitosan, and Beeswax Based Edible Packaging for Food Product: A Review — shares topic coverage
- Functional Edible Coating from Banana Peel Starch (Musa sapientum L.) and Vannamei Shrimp Shell Chitosan for Quality Maintenance of Tomato — shares topic coverage
- Effect of the Different Surface Coatings and Packaging Materials for Shelf Life and Quality of Guava (Psidium guajava L.) CV. Allahabad Safeda — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
5
Page views
0
PDF downloads
1
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.