Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Model Classification Methods in the Treatment of Corneal Ulcers with Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Rafael Souza da Silva, Matheus Cândido Feitosa, Mariza Brandão Palma, Marcelo Weinstein Teixeira, Anísio Francisco Soares

Archives of Current Research International · pp. 515–522 · Published 21 Apr 2025

10.9734/acri/2025/v25i41181

Abstract

The study was carried out to classify the difficulty in treating corneal ulcers using mesenchymal stem cells as cell therapy. Seven studies were used to carry out the research. It was carried out by the Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology (DMFA) and the Laboratory of Physiology and Experimental Surgery (LAFICE). The research was carried out through a bibliographic survey, highlighting the following topics: routes of application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs), tissue origin of MSCs, sex of the animal, species of the animal, depth of the corneal ulcer, comorbidity and time required for re-epithelialization. The results showed that the study that came closest to the set of topics related to increased treatment difficulty took 270 days to recover. The study that came closest to the set of topics related to the least difficulty of treatment took 21 days to recover, demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed classification of difficulty of treatment. The study concludes the efficiency of the method for classifying the difficulty of treating corneal ulcers using mesenchymal stem cells.

Stem cells mesenchymal stem cells ophthalmology cell therapy and corneal ulcer

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.