Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Assessment of the Potential of Antitranspirants in Yield Enhancement of Brassica napus L. under Water Stress Conditions

Arka Pakhira, Gritta Elizabeth Jolly, M. Jincy, Animesh Ghosh Bag

International Journal of Plant & Soil Science · pp. 124–152 · Published 23 Jul 2025

10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i85616

Abstract

Background: This experiment uses various antitranspirants to increase leaf resistance to water vapor transfer. Irrigation scheduling is based on soil field capacity, which means irrigation was provided at 100%, 75%, and 50% field capacity. Research aims to conserve soil water and maintain water balance in plants by reducing transpiration. As water scarcity increases, assessing the anti-transpirant’s effectiveness could help develop better-rainfed farming crop technology. Methods: In this experiment 5 sub-plot treatments (antitranspirants) and 3 main plot treatments (different irrigation levels) were there. The antitranspirants are applied by foliar spray and the interval of spraying of antitranspirants was 30 days. The first spray was done at 21 days after sowing. The growth and yield parameters were taken manually and analyzed using STATISTIX-10 and OPSTAT. Results: Moisture aids plant growth and development, but high moisture causes more vegetative growth and less economic yield. Based on the analysis of the data it was observed that a moderate level of irrigation that is irrigation at 75% FC, produced the highest yield. Antitranspirants like Kaolin 6% showed improved physiology and WUE, highest production, crop growth, and development. Kaolin 6% was observed to be reducing proline content which indicates stress level, as a result increasing chlorophyll content, reducing stomatal densities, and improving nutrient uptake. Thus Kaolin 6% with irrigation at 75% FC was the most effective for yield, development and stress resistance. Cycocel 1000ppm being a growth retardant showed potential in yield increase and stress tolerance. 

Antitranspirants water stress irrigation water conservation field capacity

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

15

Page views

0

PDF downloads

2

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.