Assessment of Four Different Methods of Measuring Biparietal Diameter through Comparative Analysis: A Prospective Study
Joseph Anthony Ndukwu, Tochukwu Nicholas Ugwu, Chidinma Ogochukwu Ukachukwu, Theophilus Edoki
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 105–111 · Published 26 Mar 2025
10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i45784Abstract
The study evaluates the accuracy of the different methods of measuring biparietal diameter (BPD) as an index of estimating gestational age (GA). This study was a prospective comparative analysis with 107 pregnant patient’s participants. They were examined abdominally in university of Calabar teaching hospital, cross River, Nigeria. The paired t-test was employed to compare the different methods of biparietal diameter to assess their accuracy. The results showed that there was no significant difference (P˂0.05) in the methods of estimating gestational age using biparietal method except for outer to inner and table and table method which was 0.0719. When the paired t-test sample was used to compare the different methods with the last menstrual period (LMP) and gestational age, there was no significant difference in all the four different methods. However, the outer to inner and table to table method appears to be more significant indicating its suitability as a method of obtaining gestational age using biparietal diameter.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Common Findings in Ultrasound Examination of the Liver and Kidney in Sokoto Metropolis — shares topic coverage
- Ultrasonography as a Tool in Assessment of Breast Pain among Women — shares topic coverage
- A Case Report of Breast Myofibroblastoma: A Bad Looking Benign Tumor — shares topic coverage
- Diagnostic Utility of Lipid Indices for Detecting MASLD in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome — shares topic coverage
- Ultrasonic for Reducing Tetracycline Residues in Acacia Honey and Its Impact on Physicochemical Properties — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
29
Page views
0
PDF downloads
4
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.