Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

AI Anxiety and Adaptability among Teachers in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Anil Kumar Jain, Praveen Kumar T D, K. Kalyani, A. N. Roopa

Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 713–730 · Published 21 May 2026

10.9734/jsrr/2026/v32i54212

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education has sparked significant interest in understanding its psychological and practical implications for teachers, particularly concerning AI-related anxiety and adaptability. While AI offers transformative potential for teaching and learning, its adoption has also introduced uncertainties and challenges that may affect educators’ emotional and professional responses. This systematic literature review examines the multifaceted relationship between AI anxiety and adaptability among higher education teachers, synthesizing existing research to identify key themes, gaps, and future directions. We analyze studies across dimensions such as adoption and acceptance of AI, its impact on teachers and students, teaching practices, psychological factors, assessment integrity, and AI literacy. The review employs a rigorous methodology to systematically identify, evaluate, and interpret relevant literature, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the current scholarly landscape. Findings reveal that AI anxiety often stems from concerns about job displacement, ethical dilemmas, and inadequate training, while adaptability is influenced by institutional support, professional development, and personal attitudes toward technology. The interplay between these factors shapes teachers’ willingness and ability to integrate AI into their pedagogical practices. Ultimately, this review highlights the need for targeted interventions to mitigate anxiety and foster adaptability, suggesting that a balanced approach to AI implementation can empower educators to navigate the evolving educational landscape effectively.

Teacher education psychological factors apprehension lms artificial intelligence computer interaction

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

2

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.