Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Adversarial Threats to AI-Driven Systems: Exploring the Attack Surface of Machine Learning Models and Countermeasures

Abayomi Titilola Olutimehin, Adekunbi Justina Ajayi, Olufunke Cynthia Metibemu, Adebayo Yusuf Balogun, Tunbosun Oyewale Oladoyinbo, Oluwaseun Oladeji Olaniyi

Journal of Engineering Research and Reports · pp. 341–362 · Published 13 Feb 2025

10.9734/jerr/2025/v27i21413

Abstract

Adversarial attacks pose a critical threat to the reliability of AI-driven systems, exploiting vulnerabilities at the data, model, and deployment levels. This study employs a quantitative analysis using the CIFAR-10 Adversarial Examples Dataset from IBM’s Adversarial Robustness Toolbox and the MITRE ATLAS AI Model Vulnerabilities Dataset to assess attack success rates and attack surface exposure. A convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier was evaluated against Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD), and Carlini & Wagner (C&W) attacks, yielding misclassification rates of 42.2%, 65.5%, and 86.8%, respectively. Statistical analysis using the Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test (p < 0.001) confirmed a disproportionate targeting of model-level vulnerabilities (53.6%). These vulnerabilities pose severe risks across real-world AI applications. In cybersecurity, adversarial perturbations compromise intrusion detection systems, malware classification models, and spam filters, allowing cybercriminals to bypass AI-driven defenses. In autonomous vehicles, subtle adversarial modifications to traffic signs and road patterns can mislead AI-based navigation, increasing the likelihood of accidents. Similarly, in financial systems, adversarial attacks deceive fraud detection models, enabling unauthorized transactions and financial fraud. Countermeasure evaluation demonstrated that adversarial training provided the highest robustness gain (23.29%), while detection algorithms were least effective (15.34%). To enhance AI security, hybrid defense mechanisms integrating adversarial training with real-time anomaly detection should be prioritized, and standardized evaluation benchmarks should be established for AI security testing. These findings emphasize the necessity of hybrid AI security frameworks that combine adversarial training with real-time anomaly detection. Moreover, standardized security benchmarks should be established to ensure resilience across industries, particularly in high-stakes AI applications.

Adversarial attacks AI security model vulnerabilities adversarial training machine learning defenses

Cited by 12

Trustworthy AI-Based Microgrids: Control, Cybersecurity, and Adversarial Robustness

Department of Renewable Energy Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, Gbangbala Usman Alao, Afolashade Joy Jubrilla · Journal of Trending Research · 2026

AI-Driven Innovations in Forensic Odontology: Challenges and Opportunities

Shruti Sinha, Tanmay Srivastava, Ahmad Danish Rehan · Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences · 2025

Security in Metaverse Markets: Challenges and Solutions—A Comprehensive Review

Mohammad Z. Aloudat, Mahmoud Barhamgi, Elias Yaacoub · Expert Systems · 2025

Adversarial artificial intelligence in radiology: Attacks, defenses, and future considerations

Nicholas Dietrich, Bo Gong, Michael N. Patlas · Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging · 2025

Cognitive Bias Mitigation in Executive Decision-Making: A Data-Driven Approach Integrating Big Data Analytics, AI, and Explainable Systems

Leonidas Theodorakopoulos, Alexandra Theodoropoulou, Constantinos Halkiopoulos · Electronics · 2025

Route Optimization for UGVs: A Systematic Analysis of Applications, Algorithms and Challenges

Dario Fernando Yépez-Ponce, William Montalvo, Ximena Alexandra Guamán-Gavilanes · Applied Sciences · 2025

Multi-Dimensional AI-Based Modeling of Real Estate Investment Risk: A Regulatory and Explainable Framework for Investment Decisions

Avraham Lalum, Lorena Caridad López del Río, Nuria Ceular Villamandos · Mathematics · 2025

Showing 8 of 12 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

30

Page views

0

PDF downloads

4

Outbound clicks

12

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.