Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies among Farmers: A Comprehensive Review
Garima Khaspuria, Aarushi Khandelwal, Mahima Agarwal, Mayank Bafna, Rupesh Yadav, Abhishek Yadav
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 671–686 · Published 2 Jul 2024
10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72180Abstract
Precision agriculture (PA) technologies have spearheaded a revolution in contemporary farming practices, ushering in an era of sustainability, efficiency, and data-driven agricultural production. This comprehensive examination aims to delve deeply into the intricate dynamics surrounding the adoption of precision agriculture technologies among farmers, synthesizing existing literature, identifying key determinants, barriers, and implications. The adoption of precision agriculture technologies is influenced by a myriad of factors spanning socio-economic, institutional, technological, psychological, and attitudinal dimensions. Socio-economic factors such as farm size, income level, access to credit, and demographic characteristics are pivotal in shaping farmers' decisions to adopt PA technologies. Institutional factors, including government policies, extension services, market structures, and support networks, also wield significant influence over adoption patterns. Technological considerations, such as the complexity, compatibility, and perceived benefits of precision agriculture technologies, impact farmers' adoption decisions. Moreover, psychological factors such as risk perception, innovativeness, and attitudes towards change contribute to shaping farmers' willingness to embrace new technologies. The adoption of precision agriculture technologies holds immense promise for enhancing farm productivity, sustainability, and profitability. By enabling precise management of inputs such as water, fertilizers, pesticides, and seeds, PA technologies help optimize resource use, minimize environmental impact, and maximize yield potential. Furthermore, the integration of advanced data analytics, remote sensing, and IoT (Internet of Things) devices facilitates real-time monitoring, decision-making, and predictive analytics, empowering farmers with actionable insights for improved farm management. However, despite the compelling benefits, the adoption of precision agriculture technologies faces several barriers and challenges. High initial investment costs, limited access to capital, inadequate infrastructure, and technical knowledge gaps pose significant hurdles for farmers, particularly those operating in resource-constrained settings. Concerns regarding data privacy, security, and ownership also contribute to farmers' apprehensions about adopting PA technologies, raising questions about data governance and regulatory frameworks. To overcome these barriers and promote the widespread adoption of precision agriculture technologies, concerted efforts are needed from various stakeholders. Farmer education and training programs play a crucial role in enhancing digital literacy, technical skills, and awareness about the potential benefits of PA technologies. Government policies and incentives, including subsidies, grants, and tax incentives, can help alleviate financial barriers and incentivize adoption. Moreover, collaboration between researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers is essential to drive technological innovation, develop user-friendly solutions, and address emerging challenges. Investments in infrastructure, such as rural broadband connectivity and sensor networks, are also imperative to ensure the seamless integration and scalability of precision agriculture technologies across diverse farming landscapes.
Cited by 39
George N. Chidimbah Munthali, Puming He, Lazarus Obed Livingstone Banda · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · 2025
N. Mehrotra, Mahika Phartiyal, Sampriti Guha · Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2025
Etsemeskel Tadele, D. Worku, Dessie Yigzaw · Frontiers in Animal Science · 2025
M. M. Obe, C. P. Kpadé, Alphonse Singbo · Climatic Change · 2025
Bojana Petrović, László Csambalik · Land · 2025
Latin America, Qurban Aliyar, A. Devakumar · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · 2025
Suparman, P. Muljono, Amiruddin Saleh · Open Agriculture · 2025
A. K. Khajjak, A. Nazir, L. Rodini · Pakistan journal of agriculture, agricultural engineering & veterinary sciences · 2024
G. Timpanaro, V. Foti, Giulio Cascone · Agriculture · 2024
O. Fatoki, C. Tu, R. Hans · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · 2024
Showing 37 of 39 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Anatomy: A Chronological Review of the Evolution of Context and Content — shares topic coverage
- Overview of Causes, Risk Factors and Management of Sciatica: A Review — shares topic coverage
- Optimizing the Dose-Quality Paradigm in Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review — shares topic coverage
- Checklist of Phytoplankton Species in the Egyptian Waters of the Red Sea and Some Surrounding Habitats (1990-2010) — shares topic coverage
- Serotypes and Genotypes of the Hepatitis B Virus in Latin America — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
39
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.