A Survey of Academic Discourse Strategy Ability of Non-English Major Postgraduates in China
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · pp. 29–37 · Published 27 Feb 2024
10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i41308Abstract
Postgraduate students majoring in non-English disciplines require expert academic discourse ability for effective communication and career success. However, limited research exists on the current status of this ability. This survey aims to explore these postgraduates’ academic discourse strategy ability, including language use, argumentation, critical thinking, and discussion engagement. It also aims to identify challenges and areas for improvement among these students. The results will inform educational institutions and policymakers of the need for targeted interventions to support the development of this crucial skill. The findings will also provide practical guidance for teachers and students on improving their academic discourse strategy ability.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Diversified Strains of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Circulating in China: A Mini-overview — shares topic coverage
- Chinese Agricultural Sector: A Review of Prospects and Challenges — shares topic coverage
- Economic Analysis of White-Leg Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) Production Case Study: Rudong County of Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, China — shares topic coverage
- Profiling of Chinese Mitten Crab Farmers in the Jiangsu Province of China — shares topic coverage
- Economic Growth, Farmer Entrepreneurship and Rural Poverty Alleviation in China: A Critical Review — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
6
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.