Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Performance Comparison Analysis Michmon and Usermanagers on Microtic

Yudi Mulyanto, Eri Sasmita Susanto

Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · pp. 57–66 · Published 20 Jan 2022

10.9734/ajrcos/2022/v13i130307

Abstract

The current condition is that the Village Bumdes in Sepakat does network management using the hotspot feature found on Mikrotik. This hotspot feature has Authentication, Authorization and Accounting functions (AAA) with the license used on MikroTik, which is a level 4 license which means it has a maximum active user limit of 50 users. The purpose of this research is to find out a better performance comparison between Mikhmon and Usermanager and also provide an alternative solution which is better in Mikrotik management between Mikhmon and Usermanager. The data collection methods used are observation, interviews, and literature studies and use the Quality Of Service (QoS) analysis method. The results of the research that has been carried out are in order toprovide an alternative solution which is better in managing mikrotik between Mikhmon and Usermanager.

Analysis network Mikhmon usermanager QoS

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.