Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Role and Level of Engagement of Peer Researchers in Systematic Reviews: A Review Article

Mariangela Castro Arteaga, Mike Workentin, Gemechu Abeshu, Ify Anene, Akm Alamgir

Advances in Research · pp. 6–17 · Published 23 Aug 2022

10.9734/air/2022/v23i530345

Abstract

Aims: This article aims at examining the role of peer researchers in systematic reviews of sensitive topics. While there are articles on the participation of peer researchers in primary research, there are very few studies on their role in systematic reviews. This project asks three research questions:  What role do refugee/immigrant peers play in the systematic literature reviews of collaborative research models? What are the effective models used for engaging peer researchers in conducting systematic reviews of literature? In what ways are peer researchers being used in systematic reviews?. Study Design and Methodology: this is a review article. Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were consulted to understand the extent, knowledge gap, and scope of this systematic literature review. The team developed Boolean operators with four keywords: (i) systematic review, (ii) role or contribution or participation or engagement, (iii) peer research or collaborative research, and (iv) participatory research. In total, 270 articles were found, from which 99 were duplicates, 164 articles were removed after checking their title and abstract, and seven articles were selected for full article review. Results: All seven articles were systematic reviews focusing on the involvement of peer researchers in the healthcare field and described succinctly the role of peer researchers in conducting systematic reviews. Of them, two articles described peers’ involvement during the systematic review's design, methodology, and analysis activities; however, the involvement of immigrants/refugees as peer researchers in systematic reviews was not available despite repeated intentional searches. There is no mention of engaging any refugee peers in research on refugee interest. Conclusion: Some studies show the benefits of involving peer researchers in a collaborative design. However, there is a scope for generating more evidence regarding the roles of refugee/immigrant peer-researchers in systematic reviews. From our practice, we recommend engaging at least two peers or 20% of the members of the research team for all levels of the research activity. The peer(s) need to have lived experience of the research of interest.

Refugee peer researchers immigrant researchers systematic reviews peer-led research collaborative research design

References (24)

  1. 1 Unpacking 'Participation': models, meanings and practices [DOI]
  2. 2 An Introduction to Systematic Reviews [DOI]
  3. 3 A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities [DOI]
  4. 4 Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making [DOI]
  5. 5 Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework [DOI]
  6. 6 Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies [DOI]
  7. 7 Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: researcher’s experiences from 20 projects [DOI]
  8. 8 The DEPICT model for participatory qualitative health promotion research analysis piloted in Canada, Zambia and South Africa [DOI]
  9. 9 Community-based participatory research in a heavily researched inner city neighbourhood: Perspectives of people who use drugs on their experiences as peer researchers [DOI]
  10. 10 Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century: global lessons and what they mean for collaborative research in Nunatsiavut [DOI]
  11. 11 Impacts of older people’s patient and public involvement in health and social care research: a systematic review [DOI]
  12. 12 Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Councils in Health Care and Research: a Systematic Review [DOI]
  13. 13 How stakeholder participation can contribute to systematic reviews of complex interventions [DOI]
  14. 14 Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects [DOI]
  15. 15 Supporting peer researchers: recommendations from our lived experience/expertise in community-based research in Canada [DOI]
  16. 16 What makes it work? Exploring experiences of patient research partners and researchers involved in a long-term co-creative research collaboration [DOI]
  17. 17 Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians [DOI]
  18. 18 A Systematic Review of Social Service Programs Serving Refugees [DOI]
  19. 19 Status Eligibilities: The Eligibility to Exist and Authority to Act in Refugee–Host Relations [DOI]
  20. 20 Slrtool: A Tool to Support Collaborative Systematic Literature Reviews [DOI]
  21. 21 Towards Transformative Participation: Collaborative Research with 'Urban IDPs' in Uganda [DOI]
  22. 22 Educational content and challenges encountered when training service user representatives as peer researchers in a mixed study on patient experience of hospital safety [DOI]
  23. 23 Reciprocal Benefits of Engaging Undergraduate Researchers in Conducting a Systematic Literature Review [DOI]
  24. 24 The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods [DOI]

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

39

Page views

0

PDF downloads

14

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.