Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

How Plants Adapt to the Photoperiod

Manoj Kumar Sharma

Annual Research & Review in Biology · pp. 17–45 · Published 9 May 2023

10.9734/arrb/2023/v38i430580

Abstract

Plants are extremely sensitive to changes in their environment, particularly variations in photoperiod or day length. Photoperiodism refers to a plant's capacity to detect variations in day length and make use of this knowledge to control key developmental processes including flowering, growth, and dormancy. Through a process known as photoperiodism, plants can detect and react to variations in the number of daylight hours, or photoperiod. The physiological response of plants to the length of day or night is known as photoperiodism. The plant uses this physiological response to time-critical developmental events like flowering. In this essay, I will cover the current understanding of how plants respond to photoperiod and the molecular mechanisms underpinning this response. Three groups of plants' photoperiodic responses can be distinguished: short-day plants (SDPs), long-day plants (LDPs), and day-neutral plants (DNPs). Whereas LDPs bloom when the length of the day exceeds the crucial threshold, SDPs do so only when it is shorter than the critical threshold. Conversely, DNPs do not have a crucial day duration and can bloom at any day length. Many genes and biochemical processes control how a plant responds to the photoperiod. The creation and movement of the hormone florigen, which starts blooming in response to photoperiodic signals, is a crucial regulating mechanism. On the other hand, a class of photoreceptors known as phytochromes is involved in the biochemical mechanisms driving photoperiodic responses in plants. The perception of light's duration, quality, and amount is caused by phytochromes. The red-light-absorbing Pr form and the far-red-light-absorbing Pfr form are the two interconvertible states in which they can exist. The ratio of Pr to Pfr is altered by the duration of light exposure and is utilizes by plants to assess day length. Exposure to light in SDPs causes the expression of the CONSTANS (CO) gene, and the CO protein causes the expression of the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), a gene that encourages flowering. By exposing LDPs to light, a different gene called GI (GIGANTEA) is induced rather than CO, which is normally expressed. The FT gene's expression is encouraged by GI's interaction with the protein ZEITLUPE (ZTL), which also encourages flowering. In addition to these essential elements, several proteins and signalling pathways are also involved in photoperiodic responses in plants. For instance, to optimise the response to variations in day length, the photoperiodic pathway interacts with the circadian clock, which controls numerous physiological processes in plants. In some species, the hormone gibberellin (GA) also aids in the promotion of flowering. One essential adaptation that enables plants to synchronize their developmental processes with seasonal changes is their capacity to react to variations in day length. Phytochromes play a key role in how plants perceive the day in the complex network of proteins and signalling channels that make up the molecular mechanisms behind photoperiodic responses in plants. There is still much to learn about the diversity and complexity of the photoperiodic response across several plant groupings, even if much is known about it in particular species.

Flowering circadian rhythms cryptochromes dormancy photoperiod phytochrome

References (153)

  1. 1 CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  2. 2 Targeted destabilization of HY5 during light-regulated development of Arabidopsis [DOI]
  3. 3 Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9‐ cis ‐epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  4. 4 Photoreceptor Regulation of CONSTANS Protein in Photoperiodic Flowering [DOI]
  5. 5 A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants [DOI]
  6. 6 FKF1 F-Box Protein Mediates Cyclic Degradation of a Repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  7. 7 Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in growth [DOI]
  8. 8 Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  9. 9 ZEITLUPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light [DOI]
  10. 10 FKF1 is essential for photoperiodic-specific light signalling in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  11. 11 LEAFY expression and flower initiation in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  12. 12 Targeted degradation of TOC1 by ZTL modulates circadian function in Arabidopsis thaliana [DOI]
  13. 13 TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) Acts as a Floral Pathway Integrator Redundantly with FT [DOI]
  14. 14 Direct Interaction of Arabidopsis Cryptochromes with COP1 in Light Control Development [DOI]
  15. 15 The microRNA regulated SBP-box genes SPL9 and SPL15 control shoot maturation in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  16. 16 Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana [DOI]
  17. 17 Repression of Flowering by the miR172 Target SMZ [DOI]
  18. 18 Enhanced Fitness Conferred by Naturally Occurring Variation in the Circadian Clock [DOI]
  19. 19 Light inactivation of arabidopsis photomorphogenic repressor COP1 involves a cell-specific regulation of its nucleocytoplasmic partitioning [DOI]
  20. 20 A physiological overview of the genetics of flowering time control [DOI]
  21. 21 Developmental Changes Due to Long-Distance Movement of a Homeobox Fusion Transcript in Tomato [DOI]
  22. 22 Trans-acting siRNA-mediated repression of ETTIN and ARF4 regulates heteroblasty in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  23. 23 Arabidopsis SPA proteins regulate photoperiodic flowering and interact with the floral inducer CONSTANS to regulate its stability [DOI]
  24. 24 Release of SOS2 kinase from sequestration with GIGANTEA determines salt tolerance in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  25. 25 Transcriptional repressor PRR5 directly regulates clock-output pathways [DOI]
  26. 26 Plasticity and evolution in drought avoidance and escape in the annual plant Brassica rapa [DOI]
  27. 27 NF-YC3, NF-YC4 and NF-YC9 are required for CONSTANS-mediated, photoperiod-dependent flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana [DOI]
  28. 28 Phloem long‐distance trafficking of GIBBERELLIC ACID‐INSENSITIVE RNA regulates leaf development [DOI]
  29. 29 HASTY, theArabidopsisortholog of exportin 5/MSN5, regulates phase change and morphogenesis [DOI]
  30. 30 REVEILLE8 and PSEUDO-REPONSE REGULATOR5 Form a Negative Feedback Loop within the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock [DOI]
  31. 31 Targeted Degradation of PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR5 by an SCF ZTL Complex Regulates Clock Function and Photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana [DOI]
  32. 32 Photoperiodic induction of synchronous flowering near the Equator [DOI]
  33. 33 Towards the proteome of Brassica napus phloem sap [DOI]
  34. 34 Differential Regulation of Trichome Formation on the Adaxial and Abaxial Leaf Surfaces by Gibberellins and Photoperiod in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh [DOI]
  35. 35 The Nuclear Factor Y subunits NF-YB2 and NF-YB3 play additive roles in the promotion of flowering by inductive long-day photoperiods in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  36. 36 LNK genes integrate light and clock signaling networks at the core of the Arabidopsis oscillator [DOI]
  37. 37 Light‐regulated translation mediates gated induction of the Arabidopsis clock protein LHY [DOI]
  38. 38 STRESSing the role of the plant circadian clock [DOI]
  39. 39 The Suppression of WRKY44 by GIGANTEA-miR172 Pathway Is Involved in Drought Response of Arabidopsis thaliana [DOI]
  40. 40 Cyclin D control of growth rate in plants [DOI]
  41. 41 Regulation of Vegetative Phase Change in Arabidopsis thaliana by Cyclophilin 40 [DOI]
  42. 42 Arabidopsis GIGANTEA protein is post‐transcriptionally regulated by light and dark [DOI]
  43. 43 Competence to Respond to Floral Inductive Signals Requires the Homeobox Genes PENNYWISE and POUND-FOOLISH [DOI]
  44. 44 The Assembly of the CAAT-box Binding Complex at a Photosynthesis Gene Promoter Is Regulated by Light, Cytokinin, and the Stage of the Plastids [DOI]
  45. 45 Allelic polymorphism of GIGANTEA is responsible for naturally occurring variation in circadian period in Brassica rapa [DOI]
  46. 46 RFI2, a RING‐domain zinc finger protein, negatively regulates CONSTANS expression and photoperiodic flowering [DOI]
  47. 47 Coordination of Plastid and Light Signaling Pathways upon Development of Arabidopsis Leaves under Various Photoperiods [DOI]
  48. 48 Acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to the light environment: regulation of chloroplast composition [DOI]
  49. 49 Attainment of reproductive competence, phase transition, and quantification of juvenility in mutant genetic screens [DOI]
  50. 50 AtHAP5A modulates freezing stress resistance in Arabidopsis independent of the CBF pathway [DOI]
  51. 51 FD, a bZIP Protein Mediating Signals from the Floral Pathway Integrator FT at the Shoot Apex [DOI]
  52. 52 Distinct Roles of CONSTANS Target Genes in Reproductive Development of Arabidopsis [DOI]
  53. 53 Reciprocal Regulation Between TOC1 and LHY / CCA1 Within the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock [DOI]
  54. 54 Temporal regulation of shoot development in Arabidopsis thaliana by miR156 and its target SPL3 [DOI]
  55. 55 Constitutive Expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) Gene Disrupts Circadian Rhythms and Suppresses Its Own Expression [DOI]
  56. 56 Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth [DOI]
  57. 57 FKF1 and GIGANTEA Complex Formation Is Required for Day-Length Measurement in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  58. 58 The late elongated hypocotyl Mutation of Arabidopsis Disrupts Circadian Rhythms and the Photoperiodic Control of Flowering [DOI]
  59. 59 Photoperiodic Flowering: Time Measurement Mechanisms in Leaves [DOI]
  60. 60 The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1 [DOI]
  61. 61 Nuclear processing and export of microRNAs in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  62. 62 Export of FT Protein from Phloem Companion Cells Is Sufficient for Floral Induction in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  63. 63 Regulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 by TAS3 ta-siRNA Affects Developmental Timing and Patterning in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  64. 64 The miRNA156/157 recognition element in the 3′ UTR of the Arabidopsis SBP box gene SPL3 prevents early flowering by translational inhibition in seedlings [DOI]
  65. 65 DICER-LIKE 4 functions in trans-acting small interfering RNA biogenesis and vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis thaliana [DOI]
  66. 66 Arabidopsis COP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response [DOI]
  67. 67 Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering‐time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants [DOI]
  68. 68 TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis Homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, Counteracts the Activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the Vascular Tissues of Leaves to Regulate Flowering Time [DOI]
  69. 69 LAF1 ubiquitination by COP1 controls photomorphogenesis and is stimulated by SPA1 [DOI]
  70. 70 FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein May Act as the Long-Distance Florigenic Signal in the Cucurbits [DOI]
  71. 71 microRNA172 down-regulates glossy15 to promote vegetative phase change in maize [DOI]
  72. 72 Overlapping and Distinct Roles of PRR7 and PRR9 in the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock [DOI]
  73. 73 The diurnal metabolism of leaf starch [DOI]
  74. 74 SOC1 translocated to the nucleus by interaction with AGL24 directly regulates LEAFY [DOI]
  75. 75 Cryptochromes Are Required for Phytochrome Signaling to the Circadian Clock but Not for Rhythmicity [DOI]
  76. 76 Dynamics of a Mobile RNA of Potato Involved in a Long-Distance Signaling Pathway [DOI]
  77. 77 The CCAAT binding factor can mediate interactions between CONSTANS‐like proteins and DNA [DOI]
  78. 78 Light Regulation and Daytime Dependency of Inducible Plant Defenses in Arabidopsis: Phytochrome Signaling Controls Systemic Acquired Resistance Rather Than Local Defense [DOI]
  79. 79 Identification of a structural motif that confers specific interaction with the WD40 repeat domain of Arabidopsis COP1 [DOI]
  80. 80 The Arabidopsis Heterochronic Gene ZIPPY Is an ARGONAUTE Family Member [DOI]
  81. 81 SERRATE coordinates shoot meristem function and leaf axial patterning in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  82. 82 Circadian regulation of abiotic stress tolerance in plants [DOI]
  83. 83 Phenological responses of wheat and barley to water and temperature: improving simulation models [DOI]
  84. 84 Abiotic stress and the plant circadian clock [DOI]
  85. 85 The GI – CDF module of Arabidopsis affects freezing tolerance and growth as well as flowering [DOI]
  86. 86 Involvement of GIGANTEA gene in the regulation of the cold stress response in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  87. 87 How plants tell the time [DOI]
  88. 88 Signalling for developmental plasticity [DOI]
  89. 89 The Need for Winter in the Switch to Flowering [DOI]
  90. 90 Diurnal regulation of scent emission in rose flowers [DOI]
  91. 91 The SERRATE locus controls the formation of the early juvenile leaves and phase length in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  92. 92 Regulatory networks that function to specify flower meristems require the function of homeobox genes PENNYWISE and POUND‐FOOLISH in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  93. 93 NFL, the tobacco homolog of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, is transcriptionally expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems. [DOI]
  94. 94 The induction and maintenance of flowering in Impatiens [DOI]
  95. 95 Photoperiodic inhibition of potato tuberization: an update [DOI]
  96. 96 The early phase change Gene in Maize [DOI]
  97. 97 (+)-Abscisic Acid Content of Spinach in Relation to Photoperiod and Water Stress [DOI]
  98. 98 Changes in cell-cycle duration and growth fraction in the shoot meristem of Sinapis during floral transition [DOI]
  99. 99 The transcription factor FLC confers a flowering response to vernalization by repressing meristem competence and systemic signaling in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  100. 100 The COP1–SPA1 interaction defines a critical step in phytochrome A-mediated regulation of HY5 activity [DOI]
  101. 101 Regulation of Flowering Time and Floral Organ Identity by a MicroRNA and Its APETALA2 -Like Target Genes [DOI]
  102. 102 Priming: Getting Ready for Battle [DOI]
  103. 103 The Arabidopsis NFYA5 Transcription Factor Is Regulated Transcriptionally and Posttranscriptionally to Promote Drought Resistance [DOI]
  104. 104 Plant Circadian Rhythms [DOI]
  105. 105 GIGANTEA: a circadian clock‐controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane‐spanning domains [DOI]
  106. 106 CONSTANS acts in the phloem to regulate a systemic signal that induces photoperiodic flowering of Arabidopsis [DOI]
  107. 107 CONSTANS and the CCAAT Box Binding Complex Share a Functionally Important Domain and Interact to Regulate Flowering of Arabidopsis [DOI]
  108. 108 The GIGANTEA -Regulated MicroRNA172 Mediates Photoperiodic Flowering Independent of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  109. 109 Dissection of floral induction pathways using global expression analysis [DOI]
  110. 110 Conditional oxidative stress responses in the Arabidopsis photorespiratory mutant cat2 demonstrate that redox state is a key modulator of daylength‐dependent gene expression, and define photoperiod as a crucial factor in the regulation of H 2 O 2 ‐induced cell death [DOI]
  111. 111 Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits [DOI]
  112. 112 Mutagenesis of Plants Overexpressing CONSTANS Demonstrates Novel Interactions among Arabidopsis Flowering-Time Genes [DOI]
  113. 113 A New Insight of Salt Stress Signalingin Plant [DOI]
  114. 114 Plant responses to photoperiod [DOI]
  115. 115 Circadian Clock and Photoperiodic Flowering in Arabidopsis: CONSTANS Is a Hub for Signal Integration [DOI]
  116. 116 Photoperiod‐ and temperature‐mediated control of phenology in trees – a molecular perspective [DOI]
  117. 117 GIGANTEA Enables Drought Escape Response via Abscisic Acid-Dependent Activation of the Florigens and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 [DOI]
  118. 118 Light acts as a stressor and influences abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants [DOI]
  119. 119 HOS1, a Genetic Locus Involved in Cold-Responsive Gene Expression in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  120. 120 Arabidopsis ABF3 and ABF4 Transcription Factors Act with the NF-YC Complex to Regulate SOC1 Expression and Mediate Drought-Accelerated Flowering [DOI]
  121. 121 Modulation of environmental responses of plants by circadian clocks [DOI]
  122. 122 The Arabidopsis E3 Ubiquitin Ligase HOS1 Negatively Regulates CONSTANS Abundance in the Photoperiodic Control of Flowering [DOI]
  123. 123 ABA-dependent control of GIGANTEA signalling enables drought escape via up-regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis thaliana [DOI]
  124. 124 An Arabidopsis F-box protein acts as a transcriptional co-factor to regulate floral development [DOI]
  125. 125 Potential regulation of gene expression in photosynthetic cells by redox and energy state: approaches towards better understanding [DOI]
  126. 126 Integration of Cellular and Physiological Functions of Guard Cells [DOI]
  127. 127 GIGANTEA is a co-chaperone which facilitates maturation of ZEITLUPE in the Arabidopsis circadian clock [DOI]
  128. 128 Light Perception: A Matter of Time [DOI]
  129. 129 Circadian Stress Regimes Affect the Circadian Clock and Cause Jasmonic Acid-Dependent Cell Death in Cytokinin-Deficient Arabidopsis Plants [DOI]
  130. 130 Ppd-H1 integrates drought stress signals to control spike development and flowering time in barley [DOI]
  131. 131 Photoperiod controls vegetation phenology across Africa [DOI]
  132. 132 Photoperiod sensing of the circadian clock is controlled by EARLY FLOWERING 3 and GIGANTEA [DOI]
  133. 133 Response of the Circadian Clock and Diel Starch Turnover to One Day of Low Light or Low CO 2 [DOI]
  134. 134 The role of reactive oxygen species in the integration of temperature and light signals [DOI]
  135. 135 Photoperiod stress induces an oxidative burst-like response and is associated with increased apoplastic peroxidase and decreased catalase activities [DOI]
  136. 136 Flowering-Time Genes Modulate the Response to LEAFY Activity [DOI]
  137. 137 Genetic control of branching pattern and floral identity during Petunia inflorescence development [DOI]
  138. 138 Hd3a,RFT1andEhd1integrate photoperiodic and drought stress signals to delay the floral transition in rice [DOI]
  139. 139 Chloroplast retrograde signal regulates flowering [DOI]
  140. 140 A rice heterochronic mutant,mori1, is defective in the juvenile-adult phase change [DOI]
  141. 141 Root‐derived trans ‐zeatin cytokinin protects Arabidopsis plants against photoperiod stress [DOI]
  142. 142 Novel Stress in Plants by Altering the Photoperiod [DOI]
  143. 143 Recent Insights into Plant Circadian Clock Response Against Abiotic Stress [DOI]
  144. 144 Photoperiodic Signaling and Senescence, an Ancient Solution to a Modern Problem? [DOI]
  145. 145 The Effects of Temperature and Light Integral on the Phases of Photoperiod Sensitivity inPetunia×hybrida [DOI]
  146. 146 Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity [DOI]
  147. 147 Day-Length Perception and the Photoperiodic Regulation of Flowering in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  148. 148 Global Profiling of the Circadian Transcriptome Using Microarrays [DOI]
  149. 149 SGS3 and SGS2/SDE1/RDR6 are required for juvenile development and the production of trans -acting siRNAs in Arabidopsis [DOI]
  150. 150 The transcriptomic landscape of the photoperiodic stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana resembles the response to pathogen infection [DOI]
  151. 151 Photoperiodism in Plants [DOI]
  152. 152 The miR166 mediated regulatory module controls plant height by regulating gibberellic acid biosynthesis and catabolism in soybean [DOI]
  153. 153 THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF DROUGHT ESCAPE IN AVENA BARBATA, AN ANNUAL GRASS [DOI]

Cited by 10

Chemical Camouflage in Plants: Defensive Science of Stealth against Insect Herbivory

Manisha Parashar, Maniraj Rathinam, Narasimham Dokka · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology · 2025

Showing 1 of 10 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

50

Page views

0

PDF downloads

12

Outbound clicks

10

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.