Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Graph Model Conflict Resolution Approach for Jordan River Basin Dispute

Ahmed E. Al-Juaidi, Tarek Hegazy

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 1–13 · Published 14 Jun 2017

10.9734/BJAST/2017/32446

Abstract

This paper aims to establish a practical conflict resolution mechanism and applies it to solve the strategic long-term dispute for Jordan River Basin. The paper starts with a brief history of the Jordan River Basin dispute. The paper then presents a game theoretic approach based on the Graph Model technique for conflict resolution, to investigate the Jordan River Basin dispute, considering the complex socio-political aspects involved. The proposed model of defines the courses of actions available to all the involved stakeholders along with their preferences among them. Accordingly, the model applies stability and sensitivity analyses to propose an optimum resolution to the conflict and to examine the sensitivity of such resolution to the uncertainty in stakeholders’ preferences. In this study, three scenarios were investigated with different coalition possibilities among different countries, as follow: (i) Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and Jordan; (ii) Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, and Palestine; and (iii) Jordan, Israel, and Palestine. The results suggest that the best resolution for all parties is through combined water and peace treaties. The results also indicate that a peace treaty between Israel and Palestine is the best resolution to the conflicts. The application of the Graph model in this paper shows its practicality and ability to provide each decision maker with a simulation environment to examine the actions and counteractions that take place during the negotiation among the different parties.

Water disputes conflict resolution graph model decision support system multiple criteria decision analysis Jordan River Basin

References (20)

  1. 1 Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
  2. 2 Game theory and water resources [DOI]
  3. 3 Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution [DOI]
  4. 4 Inventory of Shared Water Resources in Western Asia [DOI]
  5. 5 Incentive compatibility and conflict resolution in international river basins: A case study of the Nile Basin [DOI]
  6. 6 A Game Theory Approach to the Problems of International River Basins [DOI]
  7. 7 Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico [DOI]
  8. 8 Conflict Resolution in Construction Disputes Using the Graph Model [DOI]
  9. 9 Transboundary water management Game-theoretic lessons for projects on the US–Mexico border [DOI]
  10. 10 International Water Resources Allocation and Conflicts: The Case of the Euphrates and Tigris [DOI]
  11. 11 Sharing a Multi-National Resource through Bankruptcy Procedures [DOI]
  12. 12 Bargaining over the Caspian Sea — The Largest Lake on the Earth [DOI]
  13. 13 The graph model for conflict resolution with information-gap uncertainty in preferences [DOI]
  14. 14 On the mutually beneficial cooperative scheme: Dynamic change in the payoff matrix of international river basin schemes [DOI]
  15. 15 Strategic Insights into the Jordan River Conflict [DOI]
  16. 16 Water diversions in the great lakes basin analyzed in a game theory framework [DOI]
  17. 17 Multi-criteria decision analysis for infrastructure privatisation using conflict resolution [DOI]
  18. 18 Canadian bulk water exports: Analyzing the sun belt conflict using the graph model for conflict resolution [DOI]
  19. 19 An Ancient Struggle: A Game Theory Approach to Resolving the Nile Conflict [DOI]
  20. 20 The Jordan River Basin: A conflict like no other [DOI]

Cited by 8

Assessment of future urban water resources supply and demand for Jeddah City based on the WEAP model

Ahmed Saad Al-Shutayri, Ahmed E. M. Al-Juaidi · Arabian Journal of Geosciences · 2019

Showing 4 of 8 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

61

Page views

0

PDF downloads

34

Outbound clicks

8

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.